Replies

fortheDeclaration: "The belief in the creation of the Universe can only be based on faith, since science has nothing to say about it!
I don't care what science 'thinks' about anything, I only care about what they can prove as true.
And the origins of the universe and life is not one of them."

Ha! The fact of this matter is that you are not required to "believe" or have "faith" in anything science says, for one reason because science, by definitions, never "proves" anything to be "true", nor does it ask for "belief" or "faith".
So you are totally free to reject every word from science, if you wish.

Indeed, science makes only one serious demand of you, sir: you must not call your own anti-science beliefs "science".
That's it, now go in peace.

fortheDeclaration: "There couldn't be any 'raw material' that God used, since that would make it as eternal as God."

Well... since you were obviously there and saw it, and I wasn't, I'll just have to take your word for it FRiend.

fortheDeclaration: "So, once again, stop posting your idiotic nonsense to me."

So, once again, stop posting your idiotic nonsense to me, sir.

Since you are the one initiating the contact, it is you who keep posting to me.

I am just responding.

Actually, science does prove things to be true, that is why we know what we know about how the world operates.

Those are called facts

What science can't prove is how the Universe came into being or how life began.

If raw material existed with God, it would be eternal like God is, that is just logical thinking.

It might be too simple for you.