To: hal ogen
“For the children” is actually “for the unions”.
4 posted on
11/04/2015 9:45:16 AM PST by
max americana
(fired every liberal in our company at every election cycle..and laughed at their faces (true story))
To: max americana
5 posted on
11/04/2015 10:08:17 AM PST by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: max americana
Good try but we are non union. But the prop. was crazy as it would have allowed a judge to say what each school district would be able to spend. The prop. was poorly worded and actually deceptive as it did not mention it would have reworded the state constitution. It would have eliminated the word legislature and substituted the word “state” as far as who got to decide the education budget. Lots of money behind the prop. but thank God we defeated it.
7 posted on
11/04/2015 10:36:27 AM PST by
prof.h.mandingo
(Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson