Posted on 11/01/2015 7:08:41 AM PST by tcrlaf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Take off your tinfoil hat and look at the publicly-available data at the two links in my #78 on the preceding thread.
That is public second-by-second transponder data of the last minute of the flight. Similar data is recorded and published for thousands of flights per day. (FWIW, I'm no insider; on that same thread, I published an analysis that shows an internal explosive device in an aft lavatory (not a missile) may have removed the tail section -- causing those violent "departures from flight" that took the a/c from 408 knots to 62 knots in 16 seconds. (From flight to falling junk in 16 secs...)
Good summary, Nully!
Thanks!
That particular aircraft had been involved in a tail strike some years ago.
“The Russians already know what happened “
Maybe they wanted to create a provocation for something?
I was stationed in Havana with a State Department Tech Security Officer. His previous assignment was Moscow. He had to go to the Russian Far East to certify the Consulate in
Vladivostok’s security. He flew out there on Aeroflot. It made a stop in Omsk. Mike learned that the mens room at Omsk International Airport is an outhouse. Upon arrival at Vlad, he cabled the Embassy that he Was Not Flying Back on Aeroflot. The skinflints at Embassy Moscow authorized him to return via the Trans-Siberian Railroad, an adventuren in itself.
Could be, the a321 is a stretch version of the a320.
I guess this makes reports of a Russian retaliatory nuclear strike on ISIS less credible.
I don’t know.
Last week, we flew from ABQ to Denver on an A-319.
Two rows, three seats on each side. Comfortable.
United Airlines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.