Gee, thanks.
Fag.
"PRIEBUS: CNBC WON’T MODERATE ANOTHER DEBATE, WE’RE ‘RE-EVALUATING’ ALL THE OTHERS AFTER THIS ‘CRAP SANDWICH"
20 years late, but certainly needed.
“...Priebus added, “I guarantee you, we’re going to make sure that CNBC isn’t hosting and moderating another debate with our candidates. There’s no doubt that MSNBC is not obviously hosting any RNC, or candidate forums, or debates. But you’re 100% right, here’s what I will tell everyone, everything’s going to be re-evaluated and reset. Every debate on the calendar is going to be re-evaluated, reset, look at the format, the moderators, everything. The candidates are going to — we’re going to have meetings with all the candidates. We’re going to make sure that we can do everything possible to make sure that last night doesn’t happen again...â€
Always a day late and a dollar short.
Maybe the Progressive caucus ( read in: lay down before leftists)of the GOP, so insignificantly “lead” by Priebus
is starting to wake up to the fact that they have been used as doormats for 7 years , and that now has to stop or their will no longer even be a “GOP.” Maybe its too little, too late.
The Death of the Republican party is imminent if the elite, born with silver spoons-in-the-mouth, privileged country club, Republican political class does not get out of the way for the newcomers or members of the Freedom Caucus.
Ya think?
Thank you, Chairman Obvious.
But the RNC has an interesting rule, "an RNC rule makes a candidate who participates in a 'nonsanctioned debate' ineligible to participate in a sanctioned one."
We want Mark, Sean and Rush.
And they wish to blame the guest...How about the host? Who is in charge? Who approved the script? The questions? How could CNBC have moderated such an incoherent debate on the “Economy”, which should have been taken much more seriously on a “business news” channel.
CNBC should apologize to the audience, the guest, and beg for a replacement debate.
Reconsider at least to be honest about being Democrats, Liberals and Socialist. Consider ‘Hardball’, show has run for years under the premise it was equally hard on Democrats, not!
And from this I’d guess CNBC prefers the higher debt and endless spending of the Democrats. Where’s this financial advice getting us?
And go look at the other articles about the GOP debate on CNBC; GOP Debate Comes Up Short on Tax, Budget Solutions College speaking not required at debate, GOP debate: Candidates missed THIS big opportunity, Millennials still search for candidate that resonates, Candidates’ claims: The Fact Patrol reports for duty, Zingers! The debate’s best quotes, Few standout debate winners for students on campus...
Signed, Yes, They think we’re that stupid...
Rinse. Repeat. Rinse. Repeat. GOPe got it handed to them also at the ?debate.
Do these networks pay the RNC money? I can’t think of another reason they use thee networks.
Just use non media venues with non celebrity hosts. All the networks are invited to film and provide their commentary.
I think the candidates should show up for the next debate acting like everything is normal, then come down from behind the podiums, step behind the moderators and ask the crowd for questions. Go around them and act as if they don’t exist. And don’t announce it so that the rats can’t pack the crowd.
Who couldn’t see this coming miles away - besides the Republican “leadership”?
Who actually thought Big Leftist Media would actually give Republicans a fair shot, given their 8 years of continually slobbering daily over Obama, ignoring Hillary’s criminality, forcing themselves into debates, etc.etc.?!
Republican “leadership” is truly clueless if they couldn’t see this.
Moderation is no virtue.
The Heritage Foundation would seem like a natural organization to moderate the next Republican debate.
“CNBC Won’t Moderate Another Debate,We’re “Re-Evaluating” All The Others (Shortened)”
Read: CNBC has a$$es handed to them. But they lost them. Need time to find them.
Gee, thanks.
Fag.
