Would anyone on the thread who supports this man care to take a stab at explaining how this squares with his desire to disarm people in populated areas?
Because regardless of who one supports, this is pure doublespeak.
It seems the good Doctor may have amended some of his earlier positions he stated regarding the 2nd Amendment.
My reasoning for posting this was to show how some candidates can be right some of the time.
Oh woe is you I guess. Ain’t perfect.
Yes it is. And further, single moms with kids are the ones who need a gun those areas the most.
Any guy who wants could barge into a home and have his way with mom or kids, if she didn’t have some form of protection.
Why anyone would want to make the public defenseless against any two bit thug out for a night of fun at anyone else expense, is beyond me.