Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Susan Brooks Confronts Hillary Clinton with (Hundreds of Libya) Emails
YouTube.com ^ | Oct 22, 2015 | The Blaze

Posted on 10/22/2015 6:00:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

CLICK IMAGE TO VIEW VIDEO ON YOUTUBE


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton

1 posted on 10/22/2015 6:00:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hillary: “She is just not my type, and I like Huma”....


2 posted on 10/22/2015 6:04:06 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
REALITY CHECK
DANIEL GREENFIELD
FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE
FR POSTED

EDITED EXCERPT---The Clintons had extensive ties with figures in the energy industry; companies that dug into Libya’s energy sector, Royal Dutch Shell and BP, were Clinton Foundation donors. But Hillary Clinton hid emails discussing the exploitation of Libya’s oil fields. The Clintons had made an art out of merging their political and financial agendas

Some of the deleted emails discussed this with Clinton Foundation employee Sidney Blumenthal (Clinton pumped Sid's sham hiring as "working on promoting Bill's presidential legacy"); Blumenthal was also providing Hillary with what was facetiously labeled "intel" that actually came from business interests.

Blumenthal was looking to profit while promising that the Libyan War would be an easy matter. Blumenthal encouraged “shock and awe” bombing in Libya.

According to Congressman Gowdy, “Blumenthal pushed hard for a no-fly zone in Libya before the idea was being discussed internally by senior U.S. government officials.”

Blumenthal blasted Obama for being “unenthusiastic about regime change in Libya.” Blumenthal called for providing the Jihadists with “armor piercing weapons” and called Secretary of Defense Gates a “mean, vicious little prick” who is “losing” the debate.

Blumenthal also offered a very specific “national interest” argument that Obama would later echo, suggesting that Obama was unknowingly parroting the talking points of Blumenthal.....a man he loathed....talking points which had been handed to Obama by Hillary Clinton.

Blumenthal also told Hillary Clinton that the war had to be ramped up or Obma would lose the election.

3 posted on 10/22/2015 6:15:35 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

War on Wimminz!


4 posted on 10/22/2015 6:17:38 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (I am going to get those guns out of peoples hands. - Hillary Clinton 10/05/2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That clip is odd. What is her point? What is the context? Does the small pile indicate that many emails of 2012 were destroyed, thus producing a smaller pile?


5 posted on 10/22/2015 6:17:40 PM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2015/id-like-to-show-you-something-see-how-hillary-clinton-reacts-when-rep-susan-brooks-unexpectedly-produces-two-stacks-of-emails


6 posted on 10/22/2015 6:23:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Is the pope Catholic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It’s wimmmernz!.....aka Unknown Hinson


7 posted on 10/22/2015 6:36:36 PM PDT by chasio649 (The GOPe can never seem to remember who brought them to the dance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Don’t blame her. Oh my Susan.....


8 posted on 10/22/2015 6:51:03 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The moment I saw this .. I wondered if it was the 2012 emails that she erased ..?? And, maybe that’s why the stack was so much smaller than the 2011 stack.


9 posted on 10/22/2015 6:59:41 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

The point was .. the larger stack was 2011, and the very small stack was 2012.

The attack happened in Sept 2011 .. so it appeared that Hillary’s involvement in Libya in 2012 didn’t get much attention from her.

But, it could indicate that these were some of the emails that she shredded; making the stack much smaller than 2011, or it could mean that Libya was no longer of interest to us.


10 posted on 10/22/2015 7:07:20 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Final Harvest
The attack happened in Sept 2011 .. so it appeared that Hillary’s involvement in Libya in 2012 didn’t get much attention from her.

Actually, the attack happened in 2012, hence the oddness of a smaller '2012' pile.

11 posted on 10/23/2015 8:27:09 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

Really ..?? How could I have I missed that detail ..??
I’ll check that out .. and find out where I got that info.


12 posted on 10/23/2015 10:24:22 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson