SHOCKING VIDEOS and photos found on phones left by Muslim migrants
Article and comments.
Thanks, Vel. .... Poor pitiful migrants can afford throw away phones? Oh, I forgot, they're all well-dressed young men between the ages of 18 and 32.
Posted on 10/11/2015 5:05:42 PM PDT by Nachum
Meanwhile, every news outlet - including Faux - airs mostly camera angles where the shot is contorted in such a way to show whatever small gaggle of women/children they can find.
Most of the European press will ignore this story.
How did they all get obamaphones?
Funny that while Pope John Paul was alive, Martin was never vilified or denounced by Rome, yet here you are doing just that.
One of my favorite commentators-when he was around.
There were some flaws, e.g. he extrapolated from existing problems, e.g. an overpopulated, hard-line Marxist India-and underemphasized the problem of sub-Saharan Africa, but it's still a remarkable book.
SHOCKING VIDEOS and photos found on phones left by Muslim migrants
Article and comments.
Thanks, Vel. .... Poor pitiful migrants can afford throw away phones? Oh, I forgot, they're all well-dressed young men between the ages of 18 and 32.
When one man can have four wives, three men will have none.
These are the surplus men.
Surplus men explains why almost every war in the world involves Muslims. They have to kill off the system losers or dump them on other countries.
Mormon cults had the same problem - shipping off the attractive young men so the powerful and old could have their pick of the young. Only ME Muslims have been at it so long they marry first cousins to avoid being outcasts.
It’s a dreadful religion... and a burden on every culture that comes near them.
You don't consider Martin's own papers, downloadable in PDF form from New York Public Library and signed letters from bishops and Church VIPs (among many other items) "supporting documents?" There are mounds of extensively researched documentation. Proof of the (at least) four pseudonyms he used during the council, proof of the payments he took from the AJC, proof of the affair with Kaiser's wife, proof that he had no priestly faculties after the mid-60s, proof that he was never an exorcist, proof that he forged a letter attributed to John XXIII. Proof of much more.
I'm sorry you missed it all, but it's there.
Funny that while Pope John Paul was alive, Martin was never vilified or denounced by Rome, yet here you are doing just that.
You don't know much about me, but if you're claiming the above, you honestly know nearly nothing about Martin - save for what you read in his books... written by him. Even so, if you don't consider Rome being "vilified" by his claim of black masses taking place at the Vatican, we may have a strong disagreement on the meaning of the word "vilify."
Your homework is to go back and actually read the ample documentation provided at the link. If you want to discuss Martin afterwards I'll be happy to do so.
This time however, you need to be more particular about exactly what you (think you) want to refute.
The Terrorist in Chief and his administration are cheering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.