Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Second Amendment Is One Supreme Court Justice from Repeal
nationalreview.com ^ | 10/6/2015 | David French

Posted on 10/08/2015 2:15:49 PM PDT by rktman

In August, my colleague Charlie Cooke wrote an epic rant daring the Left to stop talking about repealing the Second Amendment and start doing it. Introduce the repeal to Congress, work it through the states, and tell the American people what you want to do — take from them a fundamental, enumerated right from the Bill of Rights. As Charlie eloquently outlines, repealing the Second Amendment is an impossible task. Even worse for the Left, it’s political suicide.

But if the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges teaches us anything, it’s that the age of judicial supremacy means that five justices can amend the Constitution far more efficiently than Congress and the state legislatures. And right now there are clearly four Supreme Court justices who are committed to the absurd view that the operative clause of the Second Amendment — “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” — doesn’t actually mean “the right of the people” and therefore doesn’t encompass an individual right to own a weapon, even for self-defense. This view defies history yet is received, conventional wisdom on the judicial Left, in much the same way that it’s received, conventional wisdom that the Constitution actually protects rights to abortion and gay marriage.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol; supremes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: rktman

That would be 5 Justices putting themselves up for immediate impeachment - if the Congress could finds its gonads with either hand.


21 posted on 10/08/2015 2:29:04 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

Hillary, Biden, and Sanders will enforce it. Who will resist with arms?


22 posted on 10/08/2015 2:29:51 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Did we not just go through this with #2.
Something like the “Geriatric’s in Robes”, cant mess with the Bill of Rights???


23 posted on 10/08/2015 2:30:46 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Horse hockey! The Supreme Court can’t repeal a constitutional amendment!

Yeah, have you ever heard of this thing called "Marriage"?

24 posted on 10/08/2015 2:30:54 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Shhhhh! Apparently they don’t know that. Don’t let on.


25 posted on 10/08/2015 2:31:16 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman
It will be hard to argue that the constitution is unconstitutional.
It won't stop them from trying of course.

26 posted on 10/08/2015 2:31:51 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Wouldn’t it be simpler for the feds to withhold funding from states/cties/organizations/people that refuse to comply with some kind of new “common sense” gun safety laws???


27 posted on 10/08/2015 2:32:05 PM PDT by dadgum (Overjoyed to be the Pariah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“The Supreme Court doesn’t have the power to change the Constitution.”

Yes, but they can rule that any state or federal bans or regulations are constitutional.


28 posted on 10/08/2015 2:32:34 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia
"Hillary, Biden, and Sanders will enforce it. Who will resist with arms?"

A decision like that would demonstrate conclusively that the government is no longer legitimate. Then we will all have decisions to make.

29 posted on 10/08/2015 2:33:09 PM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Legally, no. But politically, yes: they have claimed repeatedly over the last 60 years the Constitution means whatever they say it means, no matter how absurd. And they have gotten away with it.

The "gay" marriage decision was a shot across the bow-- if they can get away with that, they can get away with anything, including abolishing the 2nd Amendment.

Look for them to "amend" the First Amendment also to prohibit "hate speech."

30 posted on 10/08/2015 2:35:06 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Please, the d-bag RINOs in Congress can’t even impeach the IRS commissioner.


31 posted on 10/08/2015 2:36:56 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pleasenotcalifornia
Hillary, Biden, and Sanders will enforce it. Who will resist with arms?

Gosh, I'd hate to see it, but there would be all kinds of problems, not all of them caused by arms. Or legs.

32 posted on 10/08/2015 2:37:33 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The Supreme Court should have a fun time trying to gather up 300 million firearms if they decide the 2nd Amendment is “unconstitutional”.

I guess they would send their clerks out door to door?


33 posted on 10/08/2015 2:38:08 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Cruz: We Should Be Able To Impeach Supreme Court Justices
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/07/01/cruz_senate_should_be_able_to_impeach_supreme_court_justices.html


34 posted on 10/08/2015 2:38:30 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The supremes are supposed to make sure “Regular Laws” conform to the constitution, not the other way around.

However they now feel like they can re-write the constitution against the will of the people.


35 posted on 10/08/2015 2:39:13 PM PDT by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think the key to this is in the undefined series of words: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms.”

If I recall correctly, Heller left open the possibility of defining those words in a restrictive way.

If something is outside the definition of those words, “Shall not be infringed” won’t apply.


36 posted on 10/08/2015 2:39:42 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

37 posted on 10/08/2015 2:41:09 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (We must first defeat RINOs before we can even encounter a Democrat to fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

There are about 100 privately owned firearms for each government owned firearm.

Just sayin’.


38 posted on 10/08/2015 2:41:40 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (We must first defeat RINOs before we can even encounter a Democrat to fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

They can’t repeal an amendment. If they try it they’ll have a full scale armed revolt. Are they that stupid?

Time will tell.


39 posted on 10/08/2015 2:42:12 PM PDT by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Actually, I was thing head butt.


40 posted on 10/08/2015 2:43:47 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson