We're a speck in the universe....incapable of changing climate.
We're arrogant to think we can.
Indeed! Government agencies and global industries have been created based on bogus climate change. It's being taught in schools. Follow the money trail ... this guy's discovery will be buried.
Or not.
"Global Warming/Climate Change" is not about science or climate; it's about murdering most of us, leaving the rest in chains or living in caves, subsisting on roots and berries.
I fear this guy may be forced into an asylum for saying this.
Global warming the ultimate liberal/socialist scam.
At some point maybe someone will learn what exactly a CO2 soluability curve actually means. Or not.
Surely SCIENCE! will win the day, though!
Now THIS is a really inconvenient truth for Al Gore and the “97%” , who have cashed in on fear of government-paid “scientists” who have profited handsomely by peddling this fraud. This brilliant mathematician is a truly courageous man who will be attacked by the true believers in the CO2 Global Warming religion.
It won’t change anything. It’s isn’t about science, it’s all about raw, naked, savage power.
Poor guy has no idea the political and “scientific” forces about to hit him
“he’s blinded me with science!” tip of the hat to Thomas Dolby
Congratulations, Dr. Evans. Enjoy your brief moment of fame. Then be prepared for years of tax audits, claims that your published works are plagiarized or based on false data and vicious personal attacks on your character.
Written on very primitive computers.
“””He found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.”””
My bet is that they knew about this but used the “incorrect” application anyway knowing that, had they used the correct application, it would have ruined their power grab.
“it (Co2) caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.”
The last few decades have seen NO global warming, according to satellite data..
How many years ago was the sun reported as the cause of climate change here on FR? Sheesh! Someday it might stick.
Bookmark
If the global warming theory had been subject to true scientific skepticism since the beginning the model’s flaws would have been revealed and the model discarded as not fitting observed data. However CO2 driven climate change became political as the ideal vehicle for more government control so science was ignored, evidence showing the model was flawed suppressed, anyone who dared question the model being labeled a “denier” (think heretic) and government funding being poured to any researcher who supported the lie.
Of course the science has been applied incorrectly.
They do this so that they can get the result they desire.
“Someone” ones a company that sells squiggly lightbulbs and other ‘green’ marketed crap that hipsters eat up.
That “someone” gives some scientists $20m to fund research.
That “someone” needs the result of this research to be 5.
Well, 2+2=4.
How do we make 2+2=5? we can’t.
Oh yes... we make it 2+3.
There you go. The answer is 5!
I mean afterall... its $20m. If they want anymore money they damnwell better hit that 5 number somehow.
Then, when that 5 number is broadcast far a wide, stock in squiggly lightbulbs suddenly skyrockets. We all hate baby Jesus if we don’t buy a package that says ‘green’ on it.