Perth electrical engineer’s discovery will change climate change debate

Joanne Nova ^ | 4 Oct 2015 | Miranda Devine

[Sgt_Schultze]

A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.

A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says…

[Sgt_Schultze]

Who's surprised that the formula for CO2 sensitivity is off by 1000%?

[Ray76]

Oh but it’s “settled science” (an oxymoron if ever there was one)

[Steely Tom]

Two errors, both of which bias the results in the direction desired by the AGW movement?

It could happen honestly, I suppose. I mean, the probability isn't zero.

[HiTech RedNeck]

An important part of the picture is clouds. Whether this fellow has better modeled them than the “warmist” models, I do not know, but an expected effect would be that if the air begins to retain more heat, more clouds will appear and in turn reflect sunlight, pushing the system back towards equilibrium.

[tatown]

...and who will be surprised when this find will be completely ignored by the ruling elite, climate ‘scientists’, and the MSM?

[pepsionice]

These UN guys who did the original bogus model....are they related to any guys in Volkswagen’s diesel division?

[glorgau]

Why bother reading this? The science is “settled”.

[Grimmy]

The real question is who’s stupid enough to believe the manipulation was an accident?

The entire “Climate Change” game has never had anything to do with actual climate. It is and only ever has been about economic destructionism against The West, USA in particular.

[stephenjohnbanker]

PING

[PATRIOT1876]

A mathematician would find out that Climate Change “science” is 100% BS.

It has zero times pi validity.

It is infinitely Socialist.

It makes no sense in any dimension.

Even Lovecraft wouldn't try to make people believe such bizarre fiction as the Global Warming Scam.

[Sgt_Schultze]

I wonder what 97% of the world's scientists™ will have to say for themselves now.

[laplata]

They will disregard Dr. Evan’s data. They can’t allow any facts to interfere with their agenda.

[Wolfie]

I’ll go out on a limb and say it won’t change a thing.

[ryan71]

“by as much as 10 times, he says…”

The hell you say!

[justlurking]

There have been several postings about this. But, no one is posting the original source:

Applying Basic Physics to Climate

[Personal Responsibility]

If they were truly “random” the “mistakes” would happen in both directions. They never do. They only happen in one direction.

I’m with you - I believe what I see, not what I hear.

[Dick Bachert]

Who's surprised? THIS MORON!!

Global Warming guru Algore – wearing his ever present Nobel medal – is seen here en-route to an important “scientific” conference in Nassau hosted by the UN/IPCC where he was to be the keynote speaker.

Topics on the agenda were to have included “Finding a Good Bail Bondsman,” “Not ALL Criminal Lawyers Are Sharks,” “Changing Careers for Dummies,” “You Want Fries With That?,” “How To Encrypt Emails,” “The Best Prison Jobs,” “Getting Along With Your Cellmate” and “Getting Used to Sleeping On Your Back.”

A sudden – and unfortunate – blast of what the “scientist” in charge of the conference termed “global warming” caused the meeting to be rescheduled until Algore can be thawed some time next Spring – assuming there will BE one.

Our reporter has learned that the influential conservative web site Free Republic has launched a contribution drive to rent a freezer locker in which to keep Gore for the 10 to 15 years estimated it will take for the so-called “mainstream media” to begin covering the Climategate story.

[FredZarguna]

First, the basic physics in the article is not correct.

Both Warmists and Deniers have acknowledged all along that the basic physics is wrong. Warmists claim the simplifying assumptions in the model are insignificant. Deniers claim they are at best unknowable, and at worst result in large errors in the model.

Second, is it surprising the Warmists could be off by a factor of 10? No, and not because of ideology or differences over the model. We know it's inflated by a factor of at least 10, because that's what experimentalists have been telling us all along.

[Truth29]

"They will disregard Dr. Evan’s data. They can’t allow any facts to interfere with their agenda."

Bingo! Facts and science have nothing to do with what is going on. This is all about power and control; pick your alleged imminent danger of the week - too hot, too cold, too wet, too dry, famine, excess, etc. The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.

[Huskrrrr]