Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Property Crime Uptick Become Crime Wave?
Townhall.com ^ | October 4, 2015 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 10/04/2015 9:29:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

"Crime drops to new lows," read Tuesday's San Francisco Chronicle headline for a story about historic lows in crime statistics, nationally as well as in the Bay Area. I hope you enjoyed that headline, because it could be the last time you will read it for at least a decade. Though violent crime rates dropped in California in 2014, some property crime is rising. Some fear that changes in California law that have led to increases in property crime eventually could result in a rise in more serious offenses.

The good news of lower crime rates is especially amazing for California, where in 2011 Gov. Jerry Brown's realignment program reduced the state prison population by 27,400 (from a total of 163,000) by shifting the responsibility for incarcerating low-level felons from the state prisons to county jails. Critics had predicted "blood on the streets," but a new Public Policy Institute of California report found Brown's brainchild "did not increase violent crime." The bad news: Authors Magnus Lofstrom and Brandon Martin estimate that California's auto theft rate is about 17 percent higher than it would have been without realignment.

I don't know that I trust crime statistics, given some retailers' failure to apprehend shoplifters. As San Francisco Chronicle columnist C.W. Nevius reported last weekend, security staff members at a local Safeway often don't intervene in cases of in-your-face shoplifting. A security guard told Nevius that if someone swipes merchandise worth less than $1,000 (actually $950), it is just a misdemeanor. "We don't usually do anything," he said. If retailers are letting people shoplift, then they're not reporting thefts to the authorities and property crimes are more prevalent than statistics show. "I'm an economist," PPIC's Lofstrom told me. "The incentive to report this particular crime, shoplifting, is decreasing over time."

"This is not a new phenomenon, Debra," Chuck DeVore, a former California GOP lawmaker, told me. DeVore now heads the Texas Public Policy Foundation and is a driver of the conservative movement to reform the criminal justice system. "Some of this can be traced to the litigiousness of society."

In November, voters approved Proposition 47, which downgraded drug possession and many property crimes -- including theft of goods worth under $950 -- from felonies to misdemeanors. What a gift to shoplifters. And it's no coincidence San Francisco saw a 47 percent spike in car break-ins in the first half of this year. Michael Rushford of the pro-enforcement Criminal Justice Legal Foundation is especially critical of the $950 cap because it effectively downgraded the theft of most guns to a misdemeanor.

As Rushford sees it, career criminals know the rules and change how they break the law in order to avoid hard time. Police, in turn, know that misdemeanor offenses are less likely to lead to meaningful prison sentences. It's human nature for some cops to put less shoulder into investigating low-level crimes. (Case in point: San Francisco police did not open an investigation into the June 27 theft of a federal agent's gun from his car until investigators linked the gun to the July 1 shooting death of Kate Steinle on Pier 14.) Realignment and Prop 47, Rushford said, mean authorities release habitual offenders "until people get hurt."

Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley opposed Prop 47 when it was on the ballot. In a piece in the San Francisco Chronicle, she warned that the measure would take away incentives to push drug offenders into treatment programs. Stealing a gun should not be a misdemeanor. Ditto the possession of date rape drugs, which are used to sexually assault women. O'Malley told me she hopes California cops don't fall into the rut of believing there's no reason to take these kinds of cases seriously. Her office is pursuing misdemeanors aggressively.

Still, O'Malley worries because when someone commits a low-level crime and nothing happens, offenders start to feel "kind of invincible." Their bad behavior tends to "escalate," and "it becomes violent."

Over the years, I've supported reforms to reduce federal sentences for low-level nonviolent offenders and steer drug users out of incarceration. Still, I feared realignment would protect habitual offenders from incarceration and Prop 47 would signal that California had given up on the fight with "low-level" crimes. The numbers are startling. Lofstrom estimates that there are 35,000 fewer inmates because of the two measures.

If I were Gov. Brown, I would push the Legislature to reform Prop 47 by making gun theft and possession of a date rape drug a felony (or even a possible felony). I'd ask law enforcement officials what they can do to make sure that low-level offenders don't believe they can get away with shoplifting, car theft and stealing bicycles. Because if crooks in California are not afraid, law-abiding voters will be.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/04/2015 9:29:31 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When you are a country full of gibsmedats and illegals, crime is he rule rather than the exception.


2 posted on 10/04/2015 9:38:00 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Obama's Iran nuclear deal - The Devil is in the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Exactly


3 posted on 10/04/2015 9:44:13 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I overheard two women talking the other day while I was out shopping. They were talking about another woman who flipped her pickup three times the previous night. They went on to say that a man walked up to the truck with the severely injured woman inside and without speaking a word, reached into the truck, grabbed her purse and left. All part of Barry’s new “fundamentally transformed” America. “What’s mine is mine and what’s yours is mine also.”


4 posted on 10/04/2015 9:45:11 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Normal people don't vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In addition to treating property crimes as less serious there has been years of propaganda directed against the concept of private ownership of property with such ownership and its right to exclude a “wrong.” How often have you heard the statement: “Well it is only property.”


5 posted on 10/04/2015 9:48:35 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

That story was posted here on FR. It is sadly true.

Democrats have revved up a generation or two on high-test envy, and Obama has given them a green light to act on it.


6 posted on 10/04/2015 9:50:10 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

Definitely; our local Wal-Mart should have its own police substation with all of the shoplifting (courtesy of residents of neighboring Newark & Jersey City). Crime is getting worse here in NJ because there is no money left to pay more cops (though I don’t know how much that helps anyway); good jobs are leaving the area, and the state is trying to keep our government worker caste (especially schoolteachers) employed by trafficking illegals here - and they contribute nothing in terms of police/fire protection.

Our enemedia recently admitted that one type of crime had increased: sexual assaults.


7 posted on 10/04/2015 10:08:05 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bflr


8 posted on 10/04/2015 10:16:11 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I can go into a store in California and steal anything I want, consequence free, as long as it’s less than $950?

Whatta state!


9 posted on 10/04/2015 10:16:44 AM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"I don't know that I trust crime statistics, given some retailers' failure to apprehend shoplifters. As San Francisco Chronicle columnist C.W. Nevius reported last weekend, security staff members at a local Safeway often don't intervene in cases of in-your-face shoplifting. A security guard told Nevius that if someone swipes merchandise worth less than $1,000 (actually $950), it is just a misdemeanor. "We don't usually do anything," he said. If retailers are letting people shoplift, then they're not reporting thefts to the authorities and property crimes are more prevalent than statistics show. "I'm an economist," PPIC's Lofstrom told me. "The incentive to report this particular crime, shoplifting, is decreasing over time." "

Years ago, my younger brother was the manager of the tool section of a Home Depot in Texas...
Management called him aside and told him he was catching to many thieves. He was later told that the theft he was stopping was already priced into the price of the product.

He quit a short time later.

10 posted on 10/04/2015 10:48:34 AM PDT by blam (Jeff Sessions For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
"I can go into a store in California and steal anything I want, consequence free, as long as it’s less than $950?"

This doesn't apply to hateful, Christian, White people.

11 posted on 10/04/2015 10:50:30 AM PDT by blam (Jeff Sessions For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam; potlatch; PhilDragoo

I was recently on a jury that convicted a man of burglary for the shoplifting of a $58 wrench from a mall department store. The fact pattern met the criteria of the law. The store loss prevention officers were excellent witnesses, as professional as the police.

After the verdict was in, the very satisfied judge told us the guy had 48 priors, had served several prison terms, and was on his third attorney, having threatened the second with murder. All of this was kept from the jury. That’s the way things are. I haven’t seen such a happy dance in robes since Jay Leno’s version of Judge Ito.


12 posted on 10/04/2015 11:17:18 AM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If the small crimes are not prosecuted, the large crimes escalate. Criminals feel invincible.

On the other hand, catching criminals for small crimes can lead to their arrest for larger crimes, if the routine checks when they are arrested turn up outstanding warrants.


13 posted on 10/04/2015 7:40:41 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Interesting. This was the same excuse California used in defending release illegal aliens, to include the one that killed Kate Stienle.

When you change the law to make everything a misdemeanor they get to let all the illegals out of jail.


14 posted on 10/04/2015 8:48:39 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Obama = Harper - Mercer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson