Posted on 10/01/2015 7:52:25 PM PDT by American Faith Today
Serious Global Cooling Discovered as Paris Climate Deal Looms 10/01/2015 Share
As world leaders get ready to head to Paris for the latest pact on cutting CO2 emissions, it has emerged that there isn’t as much urgency about the matter as had been thought.
A team of top-level atmospheric chemistry boffins from France and Germany say they have identified a new process by which vast amounts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted into the atmosphere from the sea – a process which was unknown until now, meaning that existing climate models do not take account of it.
The effect of VOCs in the air is to cool the climate down, and thus climate models used today predict more warming than can actually be expected. Indeed, global temperatures have actually been stable for more than fifteen years, a circumstance which was not predicted by climate models and which climate science is still struggling to assmilate.
In essence, the new research shows that a key VOC, isoprene, is not only produced by living organisms (for instance plants and trees on land and plankton in the sea) as had previously been assumed. It is also produced in the “microlayer” at the top of the ocean by the action of sunlight on floating chemicals – no life being necessary. And it is produced in this way in very large amounts.
According to an announcement just issued by the German government’s Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research:
Atmospheric chemists from France and Germany, however, can now show that isoprene can also be formed without biological sources in the surface film of the oceans by sunlight and so explain the large discrepancy between field measurements and models. The new identified photochemical reaction is therefore important to improve the climate models.
Global models at the moment assume total emissions of isoprene from all sources – trees, plants, plankton, the lot – of around 1.9 megatons per year. But, according to the new research, the newly discovered “abiotic” process releases as much as 3.5 megatons on its own – which “could explain the recent disagreements” between models and reality.
“We were able for the first time to trace back the production of this important aerosol precursor to abiotic sources. So far global calculations consider only biological sources,” explains Dr Christian George from French lab the Institute of Catalysis and Environment, in Lyon.
VOCs such as isoprene are known to be a powerful factor in the climate, as they cause the formation of aerosol particles. Some kinds of aerosol, for instance black soot, warm the world up: but the ones resulting from VOCs actually cool it down substantially by acting as nuclei for the formation of clouds. It has previously been suggested that production of VOCs by pine forests could be a negative feedback so powerful that it “limits climate change from reaching such levels that it could become really a problem in the world.”
With the discovery of the new abiotic sea process, the idea that cutting carbon emissions may not be all that urgent is looking stronger. That’s probably good news, as it has emerged lately that efforts to cut carbon emissions to date are having the unfortunate side effect of poisoning us all.
The new research is published here courtesy of the learned journal Environmental Science and Technology, and as the Leibniz Institute notes: “Because of the great importance this paper will be open access”. ®
Genesis 8:22 "While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease."
So, the science isn’t settled?
Add to all of the sun’s natural gyrations, nature’s natural cycles and the following: http://www.science20.com/news_articles/new_ice_age_is_coming_by_2030_says_analysis-156558
So that future ocean front property in Fresno is looking like a bad investment. Damn!
What does all this sciency stuff have to do with anything?
Next you’ll be using things like facts and logic!
Such things are like kryptonite to a leftist. And probably racist, too!
Oh, I’m sure you’re quite correct. :)
This isn't science, its opinion. And it is actually a story about how stories spread thru the right wing media.
This article links back to Lewis Page at the Register. Likewise, Breitbart and Canada Free Press link back to Lewis Page. Lewis Page links to an abstract of an article but you have to buy the article if you want to read it, and apparently Lewis Page lifted part of his article from Eurekalert or Watts Up With That, but he doesn't credit or link to either of them. As a general rule, Watts Up With That is the source many/most right wing website use as a authority, though that is questionable. It hard to tell who came first, both Page and Watts published the story on the 30th.
More websites like Washington Times, Gateway Pundit, etc could pick up the story today or in the coming days, which for some a people, will make it more credible.
Trying to cut it at all is probably a bad idea. And don't get me started with the EPA calling CO2 a "pollutant"! My god we are going insane. See here: The Truth about CO2
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Can't Predict a Hurricane but Global Warming is a Certainty?
The EPA, West Virginia, and The Looming 20 Percent Hike In Energy Costs
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
This will not matter one whit. The government hacks know what they want and they will get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.