Norm
1. One winds up with single payer, the government, very few policies, you’re stuck with what we’ve got available for you, no competition, no impetus to improve
2. One winds up with a myriad of private sector insurance company players, competitive diversified polices, and more competitive rates
By what possible stretch of the imagination are these two similar to you?
Are you simply not thinking in these terms, or do you still disagree even now?
I honestly can’t understand your point of view on this.
When you make a statement that all should be covered, you default to someone paying for it. Thats where we are now.
When you put govt in charge of healthcare, which is what wrecked it, you get what we have now.
When you say ‘all should/must/will’, then government hyperregulation has to follow. Has to.
When government gets between a doc/patient directly, or via insurance rules and regsa, people die.
There is one solution. Get govt the F’ out to the ultimate extent. Out of insurance, out of regulation and out of control.
Before this madness, more people were insured at less cost with fewer regs. Default to that. Then work on the rest. Not don’s way or the highway. Or Barrys. Or anyone elses. Want ins? Buy it. Want to go out of pocket, do it. And NO interference between doctor and patient via regs.