Indeed it does!
CALLING ALL TRUMP HATERS!!!
COME & GET IT!!!!
Posted on 09/24/2015 4:21:09 AM PDT by 11th_VA
I’m so HOPING you’re right!!!!! :)
You are getting way ahead of yourself here.
Trump will possibly make a slip and the media (and the RNC) will be all over him.
This is a combined MASS effort to prevent this man from coming anywhere close to the Presidency.
All means will be used against him and he knows it.
Those that dislike him are baffled at how much support he has had up to now because they do not have a clue how upset the nation is with the path since 2009.
He is considered a buffoon but yet presents himself as a man who can get things done by cutting the bull____.
People are tired of the pontifications of the Messiah and want, a real, down to Earth “Bulldozer” of a man they know can move not only Earth but issues, bills and install a sense of JOB WELL DONE AMERICA! That is what many folks want now - just get the job done, and he is the ONLY candidate who seems to be successfully putting this point across.
Damn good advice.
The bluster is starting to grow tiring.
Trump really needs to start fleshing out the bones of his ideas. Fox & CNN both broadcast his short speech on The Iowa, trumpeting it as a major speech on his defense plans. All it was, was more of the same.
Flesh it our Donald.
There YOU go again, throw the illegals out
first, that is racist purely because you want to prosecute Obama for being part of the biggest scam in history, a president who is NOT even a citizen.
To get rid of the illegals, all you need to do is prosecute the business leaders who hire them AND jail government beaurcrats who give them welfare.
The illegals will tear down the wall as they flee the country and Hussein Obama will seek political asylum in Iran, his biggest supporter. And Hillary will worry about jail time for her part in Benghazi and supplying arms to Muslim terrorists.
Trump can win in a landslide much bigger than Regan”s best showing.
Trouble is, the GOP candidates who want to just focus on the wall don’t want to fix anything else. (And, they don’t really want to close the border.)
Tort reform?
As I used to tell my lawyer wife (now ex with a big smile), you don’t need to hang all the layers, just one here and there. The rest of them will quickly get the message that the games are over.
Lawyers are some of the biggest cowards ever.
All the invaders have to go.
OUTSTANDING!
This is the sleeper suggestion:
“5. I will cancel every single regulation imposed by Obama and Bush- we’ll go back to Clinton levels.”
People have NO CLUE as to just what an economic shot in the arm that would be, mostly because business is so good at “working around” this crap. Just as an example, if Trump did that, Volkswagen could go back to selling Diesels WITHOUT having to doctor their emissions performance to pass EPA regulations.
From a political standpoint, the left will argue that rolling back regulations will send us into the STONE AGE. But only rolling them back to “Clinton levels” will force the Democrats (and media) to explain why people will be dropping in the streets if Trump pulls it off, when they weren’t dropping in the streets back then, under Clinton.
Let’s see if Trump is up to this plan, I LOVE IT!
Bttt
The wall
The Repubs like Rubio are just moderate Democrats
Screw em. Do what’s right and the rest will fall into place
Stopping the illegals by prosecuting and jailing employers and the government.scum who give welfare will NOT stop the illegal terrorist networks that Obama is working so hard to build. We need both.
Give Obama”s terrorists a trial and then hang them.
If you have both groups against you, can you get anything through congress? That is Trump’s main problem.
He has the support of many of the governed, but not the elite. Which is why I truly think that he will not be the nominee, even if he wins the primaries.
I would add “castrate the EPA”...
On the illegal alien issue, nothing needs to get through Congress. We have the laws, what we need is someone willing to use them.
*runs to get moar coffee*
:-)
Yep—even so-called flat-rate proponents generally have multiple rates by having a personal exemption and then maintaining welfare/EITC or other benefits that alter the effective rate.
Not bad, not bad at all.
And when you see congress cutting funding for that enforcement? Or when you see local law enforcement people refuse to assist INS (or actually oppose them) because the packing plant owners threaten them?
It isn’t that simple. My home town tried to enforce the law a few years ago, and it made CNN, had a flock of Catholic bishops protesting, the NAACP (never got that one) and the ACLU all threatening to sue the small city in Nebraska. The cops got the message, and refused to discharge the warrants.
Who you vote for isn’t who has the power.
[we’ll go back to Clinton levels]
Those levels were FORCED on him by Congress.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.