Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

“We cannot set religious tests for office in our laws.”

True enough. I don’t see where Carson ever suggested that we do.

By analogy, a self-described satan worshipper has the constitutional right to try to get his name on the ballot (assuming he meets all other qualifications other than his religious beliefs), but if one of his opponents expressed his opinion that a satan worshipper should not be ELECTED President that’s perfectly okay.

He might lose all the support from the satan worshippers (and their supporters) around the nation, but he might also gain the support of many voters who happen to agree with his stance. It’s still okay for him to express his opinion on the matter.

Absolutely nothing illegal or unconstitutional about it.


140 posted on 09/21/2015 1:20:27 PM PDT by Let_It_Be_So (Once you see the Truth, you cannot "unsee" it, no matter how hard you may try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Let_It_Be_So

.
>> “True enough. I don’t see where Carson ever suggested that we do.” <<

Correct, but that didn’t satisfy the propaganda ministry, so they wrote a fake headline for the dummies that only read headlines.

That is their usual practice.
.


149 posted on 09/21/2015 1:28:46 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson