Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives, Be Careful What You Wish For In the “Kim Davis” Case
Townhall ^ | 09/09/2015 | Bob Barr

Posted on 09/09/2015 9:32:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2015 9:32:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kim Davis was following the LAW. She refused to obey a judge’s request, and instead followed the LAW on the books. To my knowledge the LAW has not been revoked.


2 posted on 09/09/2015 9:35:07 AM PDT by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Imagine waking in world where unelected liberal five supreme court justices don’t just get to “make up” the most profound and controversial “laws”


3 posted on 09/09/2015 9:35:14 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Baloney. Religious freedom and the right to keep and bear arms are the first two unalienable rights listed on the Bill of Rights!

Homo marriage is bullshit!! Literally.

You want a civil war, bring it on!!


4 posted on 09/09/2015 9:36:08 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Davis took an oath to uphold the law

And there is the gist...please, dear writer, tell me, which law did Davis break?

5 posted on 09/09/2015 9:36:14 AM PDT by dware (Trump/Cruz 2016, or get ready for 8 more dummycrat years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure German bureaucrats made this same arguments circa 1937.


6 posted on 09/09/2015 9:36:38 AM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Imagine waking up to the news that a Quaker county sheriff is denying concealed carry permits to citizens because of his religious objection to violence;

"Wake up to"? This kind of stuff is already happening, and has been happening for year.

7 posted on 09/09/2015 9:36:53 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
or, a Muslim DMV supervisor in Dearborn, Michigan has ordered his staff to refuse to issue driver’s licenses to women out of a religious objection to women behind the wheel.

A stronger Muslim case would be to refuse to issue liquor licenses. -Tom

8 posted on 09/09/2015 9:37:28 AM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
<...a Muslim DMV supervisor in Dearborn, Michigan has ordered his staff to refuse to issue driver’s licenses to women out of a religious objection to women behind the wheel.

Completely specious argument. The Supreme Court just didn't make up some dictum regarding women drivers within the last 90 days. If some Muslim got hired knowing he had a problem issuing women driver's licenses then that is on the hiring agency.

On the other hand, about women drivers...

9 posted on 09/09/2015 9:37:30 AM PDT by Obadiah (Mr. Obama, the time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let me guess..Barr is about to run for something in 2016...president, congress..dogcatcher??


10 posted on 09/09/2015 9:37:53 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Imagine waking up to the news that a Quaker county sheriff is denying concealed carry permits to citizens because of his religious objection to violence; or, a Muslim DMV supervisor in Dearborn, Michigan has ordered his staff to refuse to issue driver’s licenses to women out of a religious objection to women behind the wheel. These are among the realities that await should we make Kim Davis, the embattled County Clerk from Rowan County, Kentucky, an archetype for “religious freedom” in America.

Hyperbole. There are ways around these religious objections even in the cases where it is an actual law.
11 posted on 09/09/2015 9:37:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
...a Muslim DMV supervisor in Dearborn, Michigan has ordered his staff to refuse to issue driver’s licenses to women out of a religious objection to women behind the wheel.

Completely specious argument. The Supreme Court just didn't make up some dictum regarding women drivers within the last 90 days. If some Muslim got hired knowing he had a problem issuing women driver's licenses then that is on the hiring agency.

On the other hand, about women drivers...

12 posted on 09/09/2015 9:37:54 AM PDT by Obadiah (Mr. Obama, the time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve thought about this a bit and Davis seems to be in between a rock and a hard place, regardless of her religious beliefs.

It is my understanding that it is a felony in TN to issue a same-sex marriage license. So essentially, the federal judge is demanding she commit a felony.

Now, the law itself may not pass muster under what passes for Supreme Court jurisprudence, but that’s not her call.

The correct defendant appears to be the State of TN, whose legislature should be ordered to make a law that complies with the SC decision, not some lowly clerk.

Not a lawyer here, just an rocket scientist.


13 posted on 09/09/2015 9:38:45 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No wonder we lost the impeachment case against Bill Clinton. Was Bob Barr ever sane?


14 posted on 09/09/2015 9:38:54 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bob Barr can shove it.

There were OTHER WAYS for the homosexuals who demanded a piece of paper to get it...apparently a judge offered to issue the sheet they wanted. The two men refused. Instead, it seems they wanted to FORCE Kim Davis to do something against her religion.

Bob Barr doesn’t like to think very much, or investigate things, does he?

Why did Townhall print this screed?


15 posted on 09/09/2015 9:39:24 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Go away, Bob. You understand nothing of this issue.

Thankful that our congressional district rejected you last year!


16 posted on 09/09/2015 9:41:30 AM PDT by Prov1322 (Enjoy my wife's incredible artwork at www.watercolorARTwork.com! (This space no longer for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is not a question of whether or not we agree with that Supreme Court ruling.

Actually it is, Bob. No court clerk is obligated to follow what is in fact NOT legally legislated. We do not recognize homosexual "marriages" in the same way we do not recognize the courts as legislative bodies.

17 posted on 09/09/2015 9:41:45 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

We might end up in a society where it wasn’t practical to require government approval and licenses for actions.


18 posted on 09/09/2015 9:43:48 AM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Barr missed it big time. This is not about religious convictions. It is about unelected officials acting in a lawless manner and overturning centuries of common law and democratically established laws. To simply frame this as a religious liberty issue is misleading.

And yes it is about double standards, Bob rightfully uses Obamah as an example of disregarding the law but he uses it as proof that the rest of need to conform to any lawless decree.

Hey BOB, when the courts decree that anti-gay sermons are not protected speech will submit to pastors being barred from getting a license? Wouldn’t want to break the law.


19 posted on 09/09/2015 9:44:27 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And just think, all of this could have been avoided if a few judges did not deem gay “marriage” to be a right. Yawn.

And I cant tell you how many stories I have read in the last year of how many sheriffs are refusing it issue CCW in shall issue areas. No outrage over that in the media.


20 posted on 09/09/2015 9:45:33 AM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson