What Hill Do We Die On, Then? (Kim Davis and Religious Liberty)

American Conservative ^ | SEpt 4, 2015 | Rod Dreher

[trebb]

I hear you. I am starting to doubt we have the will to take our Nation back and will hit the final slide with some whimpers and wistful sighs. Too many have bought into the “play nice and don’t offend others” meme even as they rant and rail about how it could/should be - they will wait for Neo to show up and never realize that they could, and should, be part of an army of Neos....

[GSWarrior]

The political danger here is that when the public hears “religious liberty,” they will think about Kim Davis and her special pleading for a right that, if it existed, would mean anarchy."

The result would be chaos.. Not anarchy. Anarchy would be the elimination of government officials.

[Guenevere]

Indeed! It sure would!

[WashingtonSource]

Rod Dreher is pathetic with this stream man argument, with a false choice. No one is proposing we die on this Hill. We should, however, stand firm with Kim Davis. There are many battles to be fought to win a war. No need to surrender preemptively on any of them.