Skip to comments.
Cruz: I Call Upon Every Believer...to Stand with Kim Davis
TedCruz.org ^
| 9/3/2015
| Ted Cruz
Posted on 09/03/2015 1:01:16 PM PDT by DaveyB
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 221-223 next last
To: Duchess47
You are entitled to your opinion but if most folks share your opinion the nation is doomed to tyranny. And that is a fact not an opinion.
121
posted on
09/03/2015 4:16:16 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
To: catfish1957
You are right. I just believe that as a Christian and a moral person she is going about this in a wrong way.
122
posted on
09/03/2015 4:16:47 PM PDT
by
Duchess47
("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
To: caww
Impeach her for not obeying the law????
123
posted on
09/03/2015 4:17:02 PM PDT
by
caww
To: GeronL
"He showed leadership on a lot of things since he became a Senator. Recently he helped organise the Iran protest back when Trump said he wouldn’t tear it up, he’d police it." LOL, I remember a thread about that. Some of Trump's supporters were swooning over his brilliant strategy.
124
posted on
09/03/2015 4:17:19 PM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
(("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
To: caww
I want to see that POS in ankle chains and cuffs. He’s been breaking the law since he took office.
125
posted on
09/03/2015 4:18:28 PM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
(("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
To: Responsibility2nd
They need to decide this on their own.
Invoking that sort of veiled threat is much more likely to have the opposite reaction, however they might actually understand what judicial tyranny feels like when exercised through law enforcement.
I’ll leave that up to you, but it seems to be the same tactic that you are trying to say is abusive and unconstitutional.
126
posted on
09/03/2015 4:19:42 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
To: CatherineofAragon
I know and then he flips and they cheer his brilliant leadership
lol
127
posted on
09/03/2015 4:20:14 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Cruz is for real, 100%)
To: Zionist Conspirator
I feel as though we’ve lost so much religious freedom in the last six years...enough.
If this is the hill that will return our God given freedom, then So Be It.
I stand with Ted. Take that hill.
To: Cold Heat
How is this a veiled threat? Abusive and unconstitutional??
Please reconsider your stance against Kim Davis, Ted Cruz and even Jim Robinson.....
All I'm doing is pointing - politely pointing - out the errors of their thinking.
129
posted on
09/03/2015 4:27:31 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: Maris Crane
I’m with Cruz on this one.
130
posted on
09/03/2015 4:27:55 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: DaveyB
131
posted on
09/03/2015 4:29:23 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(BO must be replaced immediately for the good of the nation and the world!)
To: Hetty_Fauxvert
132
posted on
09/03/2015 4:30:52 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: DaveyB
133
posted on
09/03/2015 4:32:16 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: RginTN
So far Cruz and huckabee have stood with Freedom on this issue. Where are the others! Walker and Jindal also. Paul, sorta.
To: Responsibility2nd
Yes you are, but I find using Jim Rob as a foil to be a bit wrongheaded.
I have had those types of “veiled threats” as I called them, used many times against me when I had a contrary opinion to someone on the forum. I spent so much time thinking about the perceived insult that there was no possible way to reconsider my position.
I hope maybe that clears up any misunderstanding. If not, I can try to elucidate further.
135
posted on
09/03/2015 4:37:35 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
To: Duchess47
Clerk Davis is following the law of Kentucky on this, since it prohibits same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court and a federal judge have no right—no **right** right—to say otherwise.
To: Charles Henrickson
Not sure, but I would assume the maybe Jindal will chime in, but the rest are likely to remain silent..
137
posted on
09/03/2015 4:40:15 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
To: Charles Henrickson
Since I am a firm believer in States Rights, I would agree with you, however, the Supreme Court and a Federal Judge don’t and for years (since states won’t stand up and fight) they have been in charge.
138
posted on
09/03/2015 4:42:41 PM PDT
by
Duchess47
("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
To: CA Conservative; Ezekiel
If religious liberty is not a hill to die on, then this country is truly on its way to the dustbin of history. If we fail to defend this hill, then no other hill is worth defending. We might as well let it burn down and start from scratch.That's the spirit!
139
posted on
09/03/2015 4:44:06 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
(How long O LORD?)
To: Cold Heat
Walker and Jindal **did** speak up on the right side of this.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 221-223 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
