Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PBS Ombudsman: More Self-Inflicted Wounds. Gwen Ifill’s “Take that, Bibi” tweet was inexcusable
PBS ^ | 09/03/2015 | Michael Getler

Posted on 09/03/2015 8:36:46 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

More Self-Inflicted Wounds

By Michael Getler

Sept. 2, 2015

This column is not about me, but I start by acknowledging that I am something of a technological dinosaur. I still read printed newspapers and I don’t have a Twitter account or Facebook page. But the reason I don’t engage in social media is only in part because I’m a little challenged technologically. The real reason is that I’m the ombudsman at PBS and I don’t want to be glib or dash off something on Twitter that I would quickly regret, or that could easily be misunderstood, or could be used to either discredit me and my work or PBS. I had the same policy about pre-social media venues when I was the ombudsman at The Washington Post.

So that brings me to the real self-inflicted wound, which was a tweet by PBS NewsHour co-anchor Gwen Ifill on Wednesday—after it became known that President Obama had secured the necessary number of Democratic backers in the Senate to ensure that the nuclear agreement with Iran could not be blocked by opponents—that said: “Take that, Bibi.” That was a reference, of course, to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who has strongly opposed the agreement and came to Washington at the invitation of Republican House Majority Leader John Boehner to argue against it in front of Congress.

Ifill added the comment when she retweeted an illustration from an Obama administration Twitter account that is designed to support the case for an agreement.

As they say in today’s world, her tweet instantly went viral, picked up by bloggers, websites and a large number of Twitter followers and it quickly produced a lot of angry emails in the ombudsman’s inbox.

I asked Ifill and the NewsHour for a response and explanation. She explained, in an email to me and in a tweet to many others, that she was “RT'ing a @TheIranDeal tweet,” and added that she “should have been clearer that it was their argument, not mine.”

One would have to lean way over backwards to give her the benefit of the doubt that she was simply shedding light on the administration’s view of portions of Netanyahu’s arguments. But to personalize it by saying, “Take that, Bibi” is, in my book, inexcusable for an experienced journalist who is the co-anchor of a nightly news program watched by millions of people over the course of any week.

It is not the first time that I have written about Ifill and tweets. Three years ago a tweet supporting a former colleague, who made an inflammatory remark apparently unaware that his microphone had not been turned off, also brought about lots of criticism.

Ifill is a highly experienced journalist, very quick, alert, knowledgeable, and with an engaging on-air personality. She also has a talented eye for the ironies and political turnabouts in the daily flow of news that contributes to her presence. But PBS and the NewsHour are bigger than any individual and tweeting does not appear to be a tool, in these cases, that is appropriate for maintaining credibility, which is the bedrock for news organizations.

Posted on Sept. 2, 2015 at 5:02 p.m.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gwenifill; ifil; iran; netanyahu; pbs

1 posted on 09/03/2015 8:36:47 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So, of course, no apology and no “pulling this back.” At least the guy is being honest about PBS and its distain for neutrality and journalistic ethics.
2 posted on 09/03/2015 8:44:26 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She’s a twofer. PBS will back down.


3 posted on 09/03/2015 8:44:32 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So now we know whose side she’s on.


4 posted on 09/03/2015 8:46:19 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’d be dead if I were to expect any punishment of Ms Ifil, the darling of PBS’ Washington Week! She will offer an ‘apology’ and promise not to do it again until the next time she is caught!

PBS is the protected playground of liberals too liberal even for the MSM, Bill Moyers, Tavis Smiley etc. However touch a hair of the funding or allocate for non-liberal programming and watch the backlash of the privileged spending of other people’s money!


5 posted on 09/03/2015 8:47:24 AM PDT by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In the fwiw dept., I couldn't care less what Ifill has to say.

5.56mm

6 posted on 09/03/2015 8:48:41 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So—Ms. Ifill will be shown the door, then?


7 posted on 09/03/2015 8:49:10 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Biology is biology. Everything else is imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“...inexcusable for an experienced journalist who is the co-anchor of a nightly news program watched by millions of people over the course of any week.”

Just another pro-Obama liberal anti-Semitic “journalist.”


8 posted on 09/03/2015 8:50:17 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gwen Ifull and Megyn Kelly are in competition for most inept news reporter for 2015.

Kelly had a pretty good lead for a while, but Ifull’s really shifted into high gear.

Only four months to go, ladies...


9 posted on 09/03/2015 8:57:00 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just goes to show that no matter what they say they are, journalist in this case, they are really just hacks for the Democrat party, masquerading as journalists. She just couldn’t help herself, and it bit her in the butt.......................the mask is now off forever......................


10 posted on 09/03/2015 8:58:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ifill’s was a re-tweet of the graphic and caption, accompanied by an editorial opinion of her own. She should be removed to features and be eliminated from further consideration as a debate “moderator.”


11 posted on 09/03/2015 9:26:55 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I really regret that I have to pay taxes to support public broadcast system. I quit listening to them decades ago due to their bias.


12 posted on 09/03/2015 9:28:28 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Let him who pays no taxes, also not vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
She's always been an Obamabot crazy. Still don't see why the GOP allowed her to moderate Biden versus Palin. Oh wait, I do. The GOPe(Nicole Wallace anyone?) was in cahoots with the Obama campaign to bring Palin down.
13 posted on 09/03/2015 10:26:50 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Ifill is a highly experienced journalist, very quick, alert, knowledgeable, and with an engaging on-air personality”

But what she really is is a hack, a dem operative with a byline as Instapundit says.


14 posted on 09/03/2015 10:29:25 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ooh! A sternly-worded letter and no consequences.

Meh.


15 posted on 09/03/2015 10:30:56 AM PDT by sevlex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
"Dear Gwen:
This is what the famous drawing
looks like NOW...."


 photo shilo-1.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help To Keep FR In The Battle !!


Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


16 posted on 09/03/2015 10:34:22 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Only a fool would celebrate Iran going nuclear. The last Demoratic President signed a much tougher agreement with North Korea and they are now nuclear. This weaker agreement guarantees Iran will go nuclear.


17 posted on 09/03/2015 12:25:35 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

“No it was not a shot at Prime Minister Netanyahu, even though it has become apparent that, in certain circles, it was taken as one,” Gwen Ifil explained.

“TAKE THAT, BIBI, “ Ifil wrote.


18 posted on 09/03/2015 12:44:02 PM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just awful.


19 posted on 09/03/2015 2:33:26 PM PDT by JanAddams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson