Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2015 3:15:11 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: iowamark

FR is surprisingly tariff friendly.


2 posted on 09/01/2015 3:17:01 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Voting is acting white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Sugar subsidies are obscene.. so is Marco Rineo..


3 posted on 09/01/2015 3:19:02 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

End all corporate subsidies and favoritism (looking at trump there) and funding of non-government organisations


6 posted on 09/01/2015 3:25:40 PM PDT by GeronL (Cruz is for real, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
For FY 2013, U.S. sugar beet and sugarcane producers supplied 21.8 billion pounds of refined sugar to the U.S. market at an average wholesale price of 28.84 cents per pound, or $1.3 billion more than if U.S. sugar buyers had been allowed to pay the average global price of 22.84 cents per pound.[8]

28.84 cents for US sugar as opposed to 22.84 for imported sugar in 2013. That difference is not causing the price of any product to be significantly higher.

There's a lot to be said for being self-sufficient in food, particularly in basics that are used in many products.

For all the complaining some do concerning the sugar tariff, I was expecting the difference to show that US sugar was several times the import price.

10 posted on 09/01/2015 3:29:33 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Not to worry, the instant obama normalizes relations with Cuba, the sugar tariffs will be eliminated.


15 posted on 09/01/2015 3:34:45 PM PDT by null and void (Send them all back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

If the sugar lobby didn’t spend so much protecting its market, sugar prices wouldn’t have to be so high. It isn’t just the donations, but the staffing and administration of the Big Sugar organization. Also, the protection of sugar markets has given us high fructose corn syrup as an alternative sweetener. It could be argued that high fructose corn syrup causes more obesity than sugar does.


16 posted on 09/01/2015 3:39:27 PM PDT by webheart (We are all pretty much living in a fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

17 posted on 09/01/2015 3:45:29 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Like other government meddling in agricultural, sugar subsidies keep wealthy fat cats wealthy and kicking back psrt of their wealth as political contributions to the politicians who keep them wealthy.


18 posted on 09/01/2015 3:48:30 PM PDT by Iron Munro (CITY: A liberal run holding pen for useless headcount.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

High Fructose Crap Syrup exists because of this perversion of the market. Without the sugar subsidy High Fructose Crap Syrup would not be nearly so profitable and manufacturers would use real sugar like they do everywhere else in the world.


19 posted on 09/01/2015 3:48:39 PM PDT by cyberstoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark
A quick history of the U. S. Sugar Act, which was first passed during Washington's presidency to protect the rum trade in New England. Fast forward to the Cuban Revolution in 1956 when one family controlled most of Cuba's sugar production. That family, the Fanjuls, fled to Spain and to the U.S., specifically Palm Beach FL. Today the Fanjul dynasty controls virtually all cane sugar grown, refined and marketed in the United states and a good portion of sugar beet refining and marketing. Think Domino and C&H among others.

If one were to Google Fanjul and could Google them post 1956, they would find that virtually every American president from JFK to W has socialized with and been the beneficiary of financial help from the Fanjul family.

The subject sugar subsidy is a gift that keeps on giving of perhaps $1.5 billion American tax dollars to maintain this monopoly owned and operated by again, one family. It is 100% unnecessary to protect any of our food supply. HOW SWEET IT IS!

20 posted on 09/01/2015 3:49:05 PM PDT by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iowamark

Check out this clip about sugar subsidies from “The Distinguished Gentleman” starting at 1:44:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7fBwc803CI


35 posted on 09/01/2015 5:16:08 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson