Skip to comments.
Meet Kim Davis, The Woman Denying Same-Sex Couples Marriage Licenses In Kentucky
BuzzFeed ^
| September 1, 2015
| David Mack
Posted on 09/01/2015 3:09:12 PM PDT by EveningStar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: EveningStar
who cares how many times she was married?
2
posted on
09/01/2015 3:11:59 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: EveningStar
She is standing in the gap much better than most members of the GOP
3
posted on
09/01/2015 3:12:57 PM PDT
by
bestintxas
(every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
To: brivette
It’s like Joe the Plumber.
The media spent more time investigating the status of his trade license than they did Baraq’s bogus life story.
4
posted on
09/01/2015 3:13:24 PM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Impeach, convict, deport)
To: brivette
5
posted on
09/01/2015 3:14:17 PM PDT
by
VAFreedom
(maybe i should take a nap before work)
To: brivette
The writers of this hit piece, that’s who.
6
posted on
09/01/2015 3:14:51 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: EveningStar
It has nothing to do with the license. The gay couple could get a license from any number of other people willing to accommodate them.
This is about breaking her, personally. It is about forcing someone to go against their conscious. That has been the purpose from the beginning.
7
posted on
09/01/2015 3:15:14 PM PDT
by
Anitius Severinus Boethius
(www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
To: brivette
who cares how many times she was married? I don't care but the left is mocking her so called Christian values on forums such as Huffington, Kos and NPR.
8
posted on
09/01/2015 3:15:44 PM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: VAFreedom
me? conservative Republican. Married 43 years.
9
posted on
09/01/2015 3:16:10 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: EveningStar
There is no statute that makes her sign a form for homosexual marriage. There is a Supreme Court ruling and not a piece of legislation. She is upholding her word.
It is long past time that the Supreme Court and the lower Federal Courts get the slap down they so desperately need.
10
posted on
09/01/2015 3:16:24 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Drango
11
posted on
09/01/2015 3:18:10 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: brivette; Skooz; Drango; All
who cares how many times she was married? I'm guessing that the issue is being raised by LGBT advocacy groups.
To: EveningStar
13
posted on
09/01/2015 3:19:28 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: brivette
She may be “Apostolic” but in Byzantine Canon Law fourth marriages are prohibited. Period.
14
posted on
09/01/2015 3:21:06 PM PDT
by
lightman
(O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
To: brivette
Well, she’s certainly not upholding the *really* traditional Christian understanding of marriage — the Latins don’t allow divorce (or rather, really don’t allow remarriage after a divorce) and we Orthodox don’t allow tetragammy (fourth marriages, regardless of whether after divorce with a blessing to remarry — given only to the innocent party when our hierarchs are behaving themselves properly — or widowhood).
15
posted on
09/01/2015 3:22:58 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: lightman
as a Lutheran I have no idea what that law means.
16
posted on
09/01/2015 3:24:02 PM PDT
by
brivette
To: brivette
Ah no. The article refer to her winning the dem nomination.
17
posted on
09/01/2015 3:27:07 PM PDT
by
VAFreedom
(maybe i should take a nap before work)
To: EveningStar
Davis's willingness, or unwillingness, to follow those statutes are now the subject of intense national focus. She has refused on religious grounds to grant marriage licenses -- to both same-sex or opposite-sex couples -- in the wake of June's historic Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide ...What statute exists? The SCOTUS doesn't write statutes.
18
posted on
09/01/2015 3:28:26 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: EveningStar
Seems to me the question is one of should we be issuing marriage licenses to homosexuals.
It isn’t the question of whether this woman is perfect or not.
And in this instance, so far she is.
19
posted on
09/01/2015 3:29:16 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
To: Skooz
They forgot to mention that her divorces happened before she became a Christian.
20
posted on
09/01/2015 3:29:29 PM PDT
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson