Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Resolute Conservative

“Sorry, Peter was there, no pope for another 300 years.”

False. Peter was the first pope.

“Time to move on away from this circular, re-occurring claim.”

Time for anti-Catholics to stop making things up out of thin air like this ridiculous “no pope for another 300 years” nonsense.


32 posted on 09/01/2015 11:54:57 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998

I am not so much anti-Catholic as I am pro-Jesus, pro-Bible, and pro-Truth. You my friend are free to believe what you want, so may I. I just prefer to talk directly with the Father and the Son without anyone’s assistance.


33 posted on 09/01/2015 12:07:01 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

Even Catholic scholars nowadays admit there is no evidence for a “Pope” in the 1st century, so it seems like you are the one spouting nonsense.


38 posted on 09/01/2015 1:10:41 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson