It was never about gay marriage to me, just a backdoor dismantling of the First Amendment’s religious freedom and free speech provisions regarding those who oppose gay marriage.
Probably, homosexuals are hoping to dismantle religion. Everybody else says what they’re doing is fine.
Societal rights require the assistance of others, like trial by jury.
With the help of lower courts, Scotus thinks it created both a natural AND a societal right.
This is tyranny, and tyrants deserve no obedience.
She’ll quit first. Write a book and get a movie deal and tell the queers to stick where the sun don’t shine.
It is mostly about attacking judeo-christian ethics. It is partly about forcing approval of a deviant behavior. Heterosexuality gives society 100% of our future generations. Encouraging the staying together of couples in those sorts of unions is in the state’s interest. There is nothing intrinsically equal about homosexuality. At minimum, in a libertarian extreme, one could say who cares how they get their org*sms. But to elevate it to marriage is absurd.
Two women, acting like two men, relating to each other as members of the opposite sex, unable to join together in the literal sense, unable to have children without heterosexuality......should not be called the same thing.
Two men acting like two women and relating to each other as members of the opposite sex only their sex organs do not match up either.....can’t have children....should not be called the same thing as a heterosexual family.
This is a perversion of reality in every way. It is harmful to the participants. It is harmful to the children dragged into it and to those who get sold this nonsense in the public schools. It is harmful to the moral order of society in that it labels as discriminatory those who hold the highest moral values and it elevates to special protected status those who do not.
Good has become evil and evil has become good. Our government is on the side of evil.
Bingo!
I’m convinced it’s about destroying Christianity.