Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to Act on Kentucky Gay Marriage Fight
NBC ^ | August 31, 2015 | Pete Williams

Posted on 08/31/2015 11:43:17 AM PDT by don-o

The U.S. Supreme Court this week faces the first religious objection to reach the justices since the decision declaring a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.

A county clerk in Kentucky is asking for relief from a lower court order directing her to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples. Her lawyers filed an emergency application directed to Justice Elena Kagan, who handles such requests from that part of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; kagan; kentucky; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2015 11:43:17 AM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: don-o

Futility, thy name is Kagan.


2 posted on 08/31/2015 11:44:27 AM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Kagan won’t care about her religious rights.


3 posted on 08/31/2015 11:44:59 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

SCOTUS will effectively neuter the First Amendment.

Can’t have silly 200 year old rules getting in the way of social justice.


4 posted on 08/31/2015 11:45:05 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

And the 2nd Amendment is next.


5 posted on 08/31/2015 11:46:12 AM PDT by 3boysdad (The very elect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 3boysdad
And the 2nd Amendment is next.

The 2nd Amendment guarantees the rest - Davis needs a large, heavily armed security detail (Kentucky militia, where are you?) to protect her from any and all who would suggest they have some imagined right to deprive her of her religious liberties, come what may.

6 posted on 08/31/2015 11:53:45 AM PDT by dware (Trump/Cruz 2016, or get ready for 8 more dummycrat years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: don-o

“Supreme Court to Act on Kentucky Gay Marriage Fight”

Oh.....joy.


7 posted on 08/31/2015 12:06:14 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Kagan has a personal agenda.


8 posted on 08/31/2015 12:07:17 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: don-o; All

The pro-gay executive and judicial branches aren’t the real problem with respect to protecting constitutionally unprotected gay marriage imo. The real problem is the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification Senate that won’t lift a finger to protect 10th Amendment-protected state sovereignty by working with the House to remove lawless presidents and activist justices from office.


9 posted on 08/31/2015 12:09:20 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Kagan needs to be removed by Congress. As do Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Breyer, Kennedy, and Roberts.

Their lawlessness is an offense to the Constitution, the States, and The People.


10 posted on 08/31/2015 12:16:10 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

The next president will replace justices.

Lets hope it is not another McCain special dog and pony show.


11 posted on 08/31/2015 12:18:38 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dware

People are going to have to be willing to go to jail in defiance.


12 posted on 08/31/2015 12:23:28 PM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: don-o

There are God given natural rights and societal rights.

The Bill of Rights is a mixture of both. Most are societal rights.

Among recognized natural rights is the exercise of one’s religion. We don’t have to have societal help to exercise natural rights. We are born with these. The natural right to marriage has been recognized since Adam and Eve. State marriage laws are intended to help its legal recognition and protection as a natural right.

OTOH, societal rights apply when people band together for the betterment of all. They require the help of, or the protection from, members of society. Trial by jury is an example of a societal right. Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures is another.

Along comes Scotus. It made up a natural right between those of the same sex.

Scotus did not cross another line and make it a societal right, in which the exercise of this new right requires the assistance of others.

Junior federal courts have stepped in to introduce the outrage of fag marriage as a societal right, one that requires the assistance of others to be secured.

I say our national government not only doesn’t serve its intended purpose as per the Declaration; it works precisely against the tenets of free government.

It is time the tyrants fear for their personal well being.

Article V before we can’t.


13 posted on 08/31/2015 12:31:50 PM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o; E. Pluribus Unum; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

14 posted on 08/31/2015 12:36:33 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Which is fine because the clerk can then appeal to the justice of his/her choice.


15 posted on 08/31/2015 12:37:20 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: don-o
People are going to have to be willing to go to jail in defiance.

That's gonna do exactly zero bit of good. Go to jail? No.

16 posted on 08/31/2015 12:49:01 PM PDT by dware (Trump/Cruz 2016, or get ready for 8 more dummycrat years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Sorry but this Clerk can either do her job or be fired. If her religion prevents her from doin the job she should be fired. I think the gay marriage ruling is bs but the idea that she won’t do the job she is paid for because of her religion means she can’t do the job she is paid for and should be fired.


17 posted on 08/31/2015 12:56:08 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dware

The Lord sometimes asks that level of proof of one’s convictions.

However even the rabid may not want to open that can of worms. They might be satisfied to see her fired or reassigned, not personally forced under pain of criminal penalty which would drum up a lot of sympathy.


18 posted on 08/31/2015 12:59:27 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Do you want to be the firer? How would you imagine that will look before God?


19 posted on 08/31/2015 12:59:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Also consider that her job got wrenched from one of innocuousness to that of wickedness.


20 posted on 08/31/2015 1:01:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson