Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

This couldn’t really be anything better than a cosmetic change, I fear.

The DOD would, in effect, be pulling the Veterans Affairs under its roof. And as pointed out, the management of this “cat-dog” agency would have inherent conflicts. I think Carson sees this as a shrink-government move but hasn’t thought through the management issues. I agree that generals don’t need, or want, the headaches. This is an issue for the civilian side of government to manage.


69 posted on 08/31/2015 11:28:03 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Generals should be focused on winning wars in my opinion.


74 posted on 08/31/2015 11:30:31 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson