To: Slings and Arrows
I don't think it's a coincidence that the most lopsided female-to-male ratios shown on the map in that article are in urban areas, while the most lopsided male-to-female ratios are in rural areas.
I've long felt that urban living is incompatible with a normal family life for most people.
28 posted on
08/30/2015 6:43:12 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
To: Alberta's Child
> I’ve long felt that urban living is incompatible with a normal family life for most people.
That is a VERY interesting idea.
44 posted on
08/30/2015 8:20:55 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(My music: http://hopalongginsberg.com/ | Facebook: Hopalong Ginsberg | Instagram: hopalonginsberg)
To: Alberta's Child
I’d be very interested in your take from the Alberta perspective. I’m from the States but spent most of the past 20 years in Ontario. Alberta, with a white collar city, a blue collar city, and a rural population, each of roughly equal size, has always struck me as inherently healthier. I’m guessing that, from a looking-for-a-spouse perspective, that Edmonton would be a great city to be a woman and Calgary a great city to be a man.
49 posted on
08/30/2015 8:52:47 AM PDT by
Hieronymus
( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson