Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle Passes ‘Gun Violence’ Tax, NRA and Others Sue
Pajamas Media ^ | 08/27/2015 | Liz Sheld

Posted on 08/27/2015 2:21:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Not just one, but three Second Amendment groups have filed suit against the city of Seattle for adopting a “gun violence tax” on ammunition and firearms, “designed to help offset the financial toll of gun violence”:

The complaint was filed Monday in King County Superior Court by the NRA, the Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation and the National Shooting Sports Foundation, along with two gun owners and two gun shops. It called the tax legally unenforceable because Washington state prohibits local governments from adopting laws related to firearms unless those local ordinances are specifically authorized by the state.

More likely than not, the people engaged in gun violence are not the people legally buying firearms and paying the gun violence tax. This is a punitive measure that sticks it to firearm owners for the behavior of thugs and criminals. And of course, it provides a new revenue stream for a city run by progressive gun-haters.

From the NRA lawsuit:

The ordinance serves only as a piece of propaganda, because the ordinance’s mandates are legally unenforceable … The state of Washington has the exclusive right to regulate the sale of firearms in Washington, and cities may not enact local laws or regulations related to the sale of firearms.

But Seattle city attorney Pete Holmes says the city does have the taxing authority, a view shared by City Council President Tim Burgess:

The NRA does this all across the country whenever they feel that anyone is trying to regulate firearms, and that’s not what we’re doing here … We’re using the city’s taxing authority, which is granted to us by the Washington Constitution and the Legislature.

We took a simple and commonsense measure to support gun safety research and prevention methods … It’s not in any way an attempt to regulate the sale, use or possession of firearms.

Just like raising the tax on cigarettes isn’t used to dissuade people from smoking? The cost of the tax would:

… add $25 to the price of each firearm sold in the city, plus 2 or 5 cents per round of ammunition, depending on the type. The revenue would be used for gun safety research and gun violence prevention programs.

Just like the taxes added to cigarettes are used only to fund smoking cessation programs?

The city council president denies this is a back-door gun control attempt:

“Our tax legislation that we passed does not in any way control the sale, purchase, possession, or use of firearms,” said City Council President Tim Burgess. “This is done under our taxing authority. And that’s a legal principle that has not yet been tested in Washington law.”

Right.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; nra; seattle; tax

1 posted on 08/27/2015 2:21:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Folks in Seattle will just have to go the the Injun reservations to buy their ammo and cigarettes.


2 posted on 08/27/2015 2:24:37 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (http://www.freerepublic.com/~jeffchandler/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m betting someone would REALLY squeal if we “taxed” the REAL common factor in violent crime.


3 posted on 08/27/2015 2:25:32 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Its about as legal as a poll tax.


4 posted on 08/27/2015 2:26:31 PM PDT by bruoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why don’t Seattle and other places get charged with denying our civil rights?

Come down on them hard!


5 posted on 08/27/2015 2:27:10 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gun safety research... what a crock of crap. Hit what you aim at and do not point at anything you do not want to shoot. There pay me the research money.


6 posted on 08/27/2015 2:31:31 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Gun safety research... what a crock of crap. Hit what you aim at and do not point at anything you do not want to shoot. There pay me the research money.

*****************************************************************

Always assume a gun is loaded.

Do I get a consulting fee after you get your research money?


7 posted on 08/27/2015 2:50:45 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Hillary not only brings old baggage wherever she goes, she picks up new baggage when she gets there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Yes of course, right after I do an e-verify...


8 posted on 08/27/2015 2:54:42 PM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why not get right to the root of the problem and pass a tax on criminals?


9 posted on 08/27/2015 3:10:55 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gun shops can now leave Seattle with a clear conscience.


10 posted on 08/27/2015 3:13:12 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“We took a simple and commonsense measure to support gun safety research and prevention methods … It’s not in any way an attempt to regulate the sale, use or possession of firearms.”

It’s usurious


11 posted on 08/27/2015 3:25:31 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruoz

“Its about as legal as a poll tax.”

TRUE, but will a Court let it stand? Not a given in the Land of the Liberals.


12 posted on 08/28/2015 7:52:11 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson