Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plot to Impose a National Sales Tax or Value Added Tax
Freedom Outpost ^ | 8/24/2015 | Publius Huldah 

Posted on 08/26/2015 6:47:59 AM PDT by HomerBohn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
There will likely be armed revolt to scale the government back significantly.

A national sales tax would be the fairest and most beneficial way of taxing and to drastically reduce the size of the central socialist government.

It is impossible for politicians to raise taxes without everyone knowing and politician fearing an angry mob.

1 posted on 08/26/2015 6:48:00 AM PDT by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

This might be a good time for the GOPers to “pick and chose” a “battle” to fight. Time to get off your butts boys!


2 posted on 08/26/2015 6:49:45 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

> “A national sales tax would be the fairest and most beneficial way of taxing and to drastically reduce the size of the central socialist government.”

Your argument is fatally flawed. You are missing one word that changes the entire meaning and argument:

The word is ...... “RETAIL”

You really need to think before you post.

Here’s your sentence revised so that it doesn’t lead America down the road to Hell:

“A national RETAIL sales tax would be the fairest and most beneficial way of taxing and to drastically reduce the size of the central socialist government.”

And here is the link to the text of the legislation that refers to the National Retail Sales Tax (NRST):

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113hr25ih/pdf/BILLS-113hr25ih.pdf


3 posted on 08/26/2015 6:56:40 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

The problem with a consumption tax is not that it isn’t superior to an income or wealth tax. The problem is that the current US obsession with “fairness” would likely result in the addition of a consumption tax to the existing income tax, rather than a replacement of the income tax.

If spending isn’t cut, fighting over the most efficient effort of collection is like shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic.


4 posted on 08/26/2015 6:57:01 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

The VAT is the way the European countries pay for all that Socialism.....and it doesn’t cover it. When I lived in Britain, the VAT was 15%.......on goods, but not food and clothing. It is now 20%. How do you think Americans will feel about every other thing they buy having another 20% tax assessed??


5 posted on 08/26/2015 6:57:19 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I’d favor a national sales tax if it meant the repealing of most other taxes (income, capital gains etc..).


6 posted on 08/26/2015 7:01:39 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Trump campaign ad: Trump, in his Apprentice chair, saying "America, you're hired")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Sorry, can’t read that long of post this early. What is wrong with a VAT or national sales tax IF it were to replace our income tax? That or a flat tax would be an improvement over our current system.


7 posted on 08/26/2015 7:02:00 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I fully support a consumption tax BUT only along with the elimination of the federal income tax. Huckabee spelled it out very nicely at the 1st debate only to have that bimbo Kelly make a comment that the debate was getting “X rated.” Trump is absolutely right in calling her a bimbo.

We all know that this would never happen unless Trump is elected and the present congressional leadership is removed.


8 posted on 08/26/2015 7:02:16 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

You have fallen for a common miss representation of the sales tax. There is NOTHING that will limit the size or spending of the government in the national sales tax.


9 posted on 08/26/2015 7:03:48 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I think introducing a National Sales Tax is a GREAT IDEA ... a VAT... NO... VATS are hidden and can be manipulated - increased without public being fully aware...

A National Sales Tax introduced incrementally dovetailed with the Income Tax being reduced in a like fashion ... to where the National Sales Tax over 5 years replaces the income tax...

But so many would rather be a slave to income taxes than to venture into something news ... wienie public...


10 posted on 08/26/2015 7:05:21 AM PDT by ICCtheWay (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

The method of tax collection is not the problem as the amount of taxes collected will remain roughly the same. The real problem is spending and Congress’s ability to have unlimited borrowing.


11 posted on 08/26/2015 7:05:57 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

This is why I think that Cruz should drop out, endorse Trump and challenge/unseat McConnell in the Senate. He’d accomplish much more their. Trump can then appoint him to the Supreme Court before leaving office.


12 posted on 08/26/2015 7:08:01 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

A value added tax is regressive. A retail sales tax is good so long as it REPLACES the current income tax. Ain’t gonna happen under this regime.


13 posted on 08/26/2015 7:10:06 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

They say they want a national sales tax to replace the income tax, but that would not last. It would be in addition to the income tax.


14 posted on 08/26/2015 7:12:08 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Exactly!
CT is a perfect case in point.
It has a sales tax that was continually renewed beyond original sunset promise.
Then a state income tax was invoked in the early 90’s, with the promise that the sales tax would be significantly lowered, and all budget woes would forever be gone.
Reality - sales tax on Everything, including out of state purchases (literally called a Use Tax). Even tag sales on used items are supposed to collect a tax to remit to the state.
A National VAT tax will fix nothing, just as the case in europe.
Some wonder if it’s implementation will eventually become an electronic tool of big brother, ie: “no man shall buy or sell, without the mark of the beast”.


15 posted on 08/26/2015 7:14:55 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Tariffs are the way to go. The founders knew what they were doing. The plus side to tariffs are that they are voluntary and they also promote domestic industry.


16 posted on 08/26/2015 7:15:26 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
This is why I think that Cruz should drop out, endorse Trump and challenge/unseat McConnell in the Senate. He’d accomplish much more their. Trump can then appoint him to the Supreme Court before leaving office.

Paging The Donald or any of his staff lurking here...how about it? Interesting concept.

17 posted on 08/26/2015 7:17:02 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

“The problem is that the current US obsession with “fairness” would likely result in the addition of a consumption tax to the existing income tax, rather than a replacement of the income tax”.

You have stated what many overlook. Any new tax needs a corresponding elimination and replacement of a previous method of taxation. Hince, tea, taxed enough already.

The two items mentioned in the article quoted below also deserve comment:

We have never had a national sales tax or value added tax in this Country. Why? Because they are not authorized by the Constitution.

We were manipulated into supporting the 16th Amendment. We were told the income tax would “soak the rich” – and the envious drooled at the prospect.

First one is obvious as states generally charge the retail sales tax.

The soak the rich aspects of the Federal Income Tax are now laughable if not truly sad. It depends on the definition of “rich” and that has been downgraded to include the middle class, and no tax for anyone else, and thus the economic destruction of what made this country great.


18 posted on 08/26/2015 7:20:07 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; HomerBohn
The word is ...... “RETAIL”

You really need to think before you post.

That's a little snarky for someone who didn't read or think before posting. I'm more than just a little familiar with the Fairtax

The word "retail" is not in the legislative language in the link you posted.

The reason? Because the tax is imposed on the gross payment (including itself) and it taxes virtually everything including, in some cases, (gross)self-employment income, wages and interest (AKA income).

It also allows SS bureaucrats to "determine" the rate every year with out a vote or a signature.

On day one of the tax your assets would lose the face value of whatever the tax rate is. In the case of your Fairtax it would be a 23% loss on day one.

Any after tax investments held now would be taxed again (23%) when you spend it.

19 posted on 08/26/2015 7:36:45 AM PDT by lewislynn (Meghan Kelley...#sand--Rosie, the Don was right-- Hillary, lipstick on a pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
The problem is that the current US obsession with “fairness” would likely result in the addition of a consumption tax to the existing income tax, rather than a replacement of the income tax.

The socialists will likely follow Europe and impose a VAT in addition to the income tax. Once interest rates rise then the interest on the debt will explode and they will need even more money

20 posted on 08/26/2015 7:51:17 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson