Posted on 08/22/2015 11:31:46 AM PDT by lbryce
Representative Jerrold Nadler, shown in 2014, is the lone Jewish Democrat from New York to endorse an agreement with Iran. Credit Andrew Burton/Getty Images
Representative Jerrold Nadler was being pulled hard from all sides.
Close allies in the pro-Israel community told him a nuclear deal with Iran would doom the Jewish state. His Jewish colleagues in New York’s congressional delegation had all condemned the pact. Then there was the lobbying from President Obama, first with a phone call, followed by a face-to-face talk in the White House — Mr. Nadler’s first such meeting in Mr. Obama’s tenure.
Facing extraordinary pressure, Mr. Nadler on Friday became the lone Jewish Democrat from New York to endorse the president’s proposed agreement with Iran, which would lift economic sanctions in exchange for Iran’s taking steps to abandon a path to nuclear arms.
Continue reading the main story RELATED COVERAGE
Senator Chuck Schumer in Washington last month. On Thursday, he said he would vote against President Obama's deal to limit Tehran's nuclear program.Opposing Iran Nuclear Deal, Chuck Schumer Rattles Democratic FirewallAUG. 7, 2015 President Obama at the White House on Tuesday. He will seek on Wednesday to explain and defend the international agreement reached last month with Iran.Obama Begins Campaign in Congress for Iran Nuclear DealAUG. 4, 2015 The decision by Mr. Nadler, 68, a long-tenured liberal whose district is believed to have the largest Jewish population in the country, may make it easier for other House Democrats to support the agreement, including non-Jews who remain undecided on the deal. He has a history of energetic support for Israel, and has played a pivotal role as an emissary between liberal Democrats and more conservative supporters of Israel.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I would make the case that Congressman Jerrold Nadler be from here on forward be called Congressman relatively Jew Nadler.
Jews have overcome adversity through the ages.
But liberalism will soon destroy them.
And, if that does happen, I relinquish any sympathy I had for them.
relatively speaking, of course.
Ideology over country and religion.
Relatively speaking, Obama probably has “pictures.”
Relatively Jew? What’s that supposed to mean?
Didn’t you read the post?
Relatively clever, as well.
There are plenty of Jews to go through before they get to him
“Relatively Jew? What’s that supposed to mean?”
It would make a little more sense if he were called “The Moral Relativity Jew!”
For me, he’s simply an obese POS who is willing to sell out Israel to satisfy his moronic political “ideas.”
“Representative Jerrold Nadler was being pulled hard from all sides.”
Relatively speaking, Nadler has no sides. He’s a very large orb.
It would have been a special kind of irony if Germany had tasted the destruction wrought by the work of the “relatively Jew.”. As for Jerrold the Hutt, he didn’t surprise me a bit.
Those Democrat Jewish politicians who support this Travesty are all admirers of George Schwartz. Once you accept that, the rest is easy.
Nadler is a JINO.
There is no relativiely or Jew in the NYT headline. Isn’t that a FR no-no?
Obama spoke to Nadler, Nadler was star struck and like a swooning little girl did as he was told.
Looks as if when this Jew was circumcized they took his sack along with the foreskin.
Isn’t he the fat bastard who had gastric bypass surgery?
You are being UN PC. Nadler is not FAT, he is caloricly over advantaged.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.