Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confirmed: Despite Clinton's Claims, Documents on Her Server Were Always Classified
Townhall.com ^ | August 21, 2015 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 08/21/2015 2:28:05 PM PDT by Kaslin

Since revelations Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton used an unsecure private email server to conduct all of her government business during her time as Secretary of State came to light earlier this year, we've heard every excuse imaginable for the practice. As we've learned in recent weeks that top secret, classified information was sent, received and stored on the server, the excuses have gotten worse. 

First, Clinton claimed during a press conference in March that there was "no classified information." 

"I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material. So I'm certainly well-aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material," Clinton said during the press conference. 

Then the story became Clinton never sent or received any information that was marked classified.

"I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified," Clinton said in New Hampshire recently. 

Earlier this week, Clinton Press Secretary Brian Fallon tried to ease tensions surrounding a criminal FBI investigation into Clinton's personal email use and mishandling of top secret classified information by claiming she was a "passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became classified."

But a new report from Reuters shows that according to basic rules, the information contained on Clinton's private server was classified from the beginning, not after the fact or when team Clinton decided it was a convenient time for it to be so. 

In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.
This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters.
"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the White House's National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
"If a foreign minister just told the secretary of state something in confidence, by U.S. rules that is classified at the moment it's in U.S. channels and U.S. possession," he said in a telephone interview, adding that for the State Department to say otherwise was "blowing smoke."

In other words, Clinton knew she was handling classified information on a personal server and didn't care. Further, she shared classified information with her aides through unsecure personal accounts with little regard for protecting national security.

HRC has tried blaming: -GOP -@nytimes -email senders -Obama bureaucracy -phony labeling issue -phony GOP precedent

Only fault is hers— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) August 21, 2015

If Lady Justice is truly blind, Clinton will be held to the same standard as everyone else when it comes to mishandling top secret information. General David Petraeus has suffered the consequences as have a number of military service members who have improperly handled classified information. There is no doubt she should be indicted.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; hillaryclinton; hitlery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Kaslin

So, why isn’t she under indictment?


21 posted on 08/21/2015 4:03:19 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Dude, you're getting a CELL!"

22 posted on 08/21/2015 5:07:57 PM PDT by Company Man (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The FBI needs to take a serious look at where Hillary’s computer equipment came from.

Remember, Chelsea Clinton had her big wedding at a Soros estate.

Hillary is a cheapskate.

She didn’t buy a Prius to drive around in while she was Secretary of State.

Why did she “buy” her own computer system?


23 posted on 08/21/2015 5:11:40 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not to mention that, once the first classified bits of data hit the server, it was immediately classified at the highest level of data to course though its busses and needed to be protected at that level. At that time, it was no longer allowed on an unclassified network.


24 posted on 08/22/2015 3:32:14 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Yes, that is what I have been saying. If she used it for official business those are govt emails. Including the 30k emails she deleted.


25 posted on 08/22/2015 3:55:16 AM PDT by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

She doesn’t drive period and I believe a Prius is much to small for her,even though it costs a pretty penny


26 posted on 08/22/2015 4:41:36 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson