Replies

material that is now classified

Why would it not be 'classified' BEFORE she received it?

What was the 'classification' when it was originally sent?

Hillary and her team are trying to parse and nuance their way through this minefield. Remember with the Clintons that EVERY WORD has to scrutinized.

Reports from weeks ago indicated that someone on the receiving end (Hillary's server) removed the cover sheets that indicated classification status. Why would they do that, unless they were ordered to? They would have no reason to remove the classification status. Per some reports, removing the classification status is a criminal offense.

Soon, Hillary will be sacrificing staffers under the bus. Who goes first?

As with the Benghazi atrocities, Clintonesque Hillary is throwing out numerous partial versions of the story. That is intentional to convolute and misdirect what is going on.

Recall that the 'server' was first located at their residence in NY. Then it was as some 'safe' facility in Manhattan. Then, it was returned to the State Department. Then, back in NY in the barn on the Clinton estate. Then, to the FBI. Then, to a mom & pop security firm's bathroom in Colorado.

The Rose Firm billing records lost & found was just practice.

Ding, ding, ding, ding ding!!!!!

The “retroactive classification” mime is just so much dung.

Classified and unclassified email systems are separate networks and it is a security violation to move (cut and paste/retype) classified material from the classified network into the unclassified network.

These markings don’t just disappear by accident. They have to be stripped out manually.

When generated, classified material (emails or documents)contain classification markings at the beginning of each paragraph of the text ((U) for unclassified, (C)for confidential, (S) for secret, (TS) for top secret, etc.). Classification is marked on the top and bottom of each page of a document or image. Classified material is transmitted with cover pages bearing the highest classification within the document. Removing the cover page does not remove all these internal classification markings. If they are not there, they had to be removed manually.

If there is unmarked classified material within the Clinton emails, it is because it was deliberately stripped of those markings when it was being prepared. Given the published reports of her computer/email ineptness, Clinton may not have been (and probably wasn’t) the one stripping the classified markings off of the texts originally.

It doesn’t matter.

Clinton is certainly experienced enough (or so she likes to tell us) to recognize classified material when she sees it even if it isn’t marked. Every person with a security clearance is personally responsible to report this as a security violation (improperly marked and transmitted classified material)immediately whenever it occurs and to take active measures to prevent the improperly marked materials from further dissemination. This is like Basic Handling of Classified Material 101-level knowledge.

If she took the classification marking off - she’s in violation.

If she did not immediately report the removal of classification markings - she’s in violation.

If she forwarded improperly marked classified material on an unsecure unclassified network - she’s in violation.

If she allowed others to send/or receive improperly marked classified material on an unsecure unclassified network - she’s in violation.

etc.

The question is: Why?

The answer is because Queen Hillary can’t be bothered with such pedestrian, plebian concerns as the proper securing of classified material. Her convenience was far more important.

Listening to the video at post 12 will shed light on the concept of why it was not marked “classified”.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3327071/posts?page=12#12

The original info was not in email format:

“Someone had to steal info from the SCIF to get it to Hillary. SCIF can’t communicate with regular internet.”