[DiogenesLamp]

If they want to needlessly subject their children to horrible diseases that have been practicality eradicated from the developed world, I suppose that is their choice.

Do you feel the same way about parents subjecting their children to bad food and bad sanitation? At what point does the child have rights that the state needs to protect?

I am inclined to think that refusing to give your child a known protection against very serious and deadly diseases constitutes a rejection of parental obligations.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Who gives a hoot what you are inclined to think. You hold yourself ipso facto superior.