Posted on 08/16/2015 1:02:06 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
“Trumpites” are only “lightly attached to the political process”
George Will has written a thought-provoking piece over at WaPo in which he argues that the GOP should purge itself of Trump and Trump’s supporters.
Will explains:
"When, however, Trump decided that his next acquisition would be not another casino but the Republican presidential nomination, he tactically and quickly underwent many conversions of convenience (concerning abortion, health care, funding Democrats, etc.). His makeover demonstrates that he is a counterfeit Republican and no conservative.
He is an affront to anyone devoted to the project William F. Buckley began six decades ago with the founding in 1955 of the National Review — making conservatism intellectually respectable and politically palatable. Buckley’s legacy is being betrayed by invertebrate conservatives now saying that although Trump “goes too far,” he has “tapped into something,” and therefore . . . ."
Therefore what? This stance — if a semi-grovel can be dignified as a stance — is a recipe for deserved disaster. Remember, Henry Wallace and Strom Thurmond “tapped into” things.
Unlike Ted Cruz who embraces Trump supporters, Will wonders who Trump’s supporters are:
Conservatives who flinch from forthrightly marginalizing Trump mistakenly fear alienating a substantial Republican cohort. But the assumption that today’s Trumpites are Republicans is unsubstantiated and implausible. Many are no doubt lightly attached to the political process, preferring entertainment to affiliation. They relish their candidate’s vituperation and share his aversion to facts. From what GOP faction might Trumpites come? The establishment? Social conservatives? Unlikely.
They certainly are not tea partyers, those earnest, issue-oriented, book-club organizing activists who are passionate about policy. Trump’s aversion to reality was displayed during the Cleveland debate when Chris Wallace asked him for “evidence” to support his claim that Mexico’s government is sending rapists and drug dealers to the United States. Trump, as usual, offered apoplexy as an argument.
Will concludes his piece calling for “excommunicating” Trump and his supporters from the GOP:
So, conservatives today should deal with Trump with the firmness Buckley dealt with the John Birch Society in 1962. The society was an extension of a loony businessman who said Dwight Eisenhower was “a dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy.” In a 5,000-word National Review “excoriation” (Buckley’s word), he excommunicated the society from the conservative movement.
Peter Whener, writing at Commentary, agrees with Will:
"Fortunately there are conservative commentators who are doing just that [“excommunicating” Trump and his supporters], including Bill Bennett, David Brooks, Mona Charen, Charles C.W. Cooke, Michael Gerson, Jonah Goldberg, Victor Davis Hanson, Charles Krauthammer, Matt Lewis, Rich Lowry, Michael Medved, Paul Mirengoff, Dana Perino, John Podhoretz, Karl Rove, Jennifer Rubin, Kevin Williamson, regular contributors to this web site (among them Max Boot, Noah Rothman and Jonathan Tobin), editorial page writers for the Wall Street Journal and others.
These individuals, while differing on various matters, understand the difference between angry populism and conservatism. They don’t believe crudity is a conservative virtue. And they don’t want conservatism stained by an unprincipled interloper and cynical opportunist, which is what Mr. Trump is. (It’s been well documented that until a few years ago, Trump was a registered Democrat, a large financial contributor to leading liberal politicians, and held liberal positions on a wide range of issues.)
In that sense, this is a clarifying moment for conservatism. Those on the right who have become Trump defenders have, I think, made a serious error in judgment that is the result of a rather profound misunderstanding of conservatism (for more, see here). You can cherish and champion conservative principles, or you can support and praise Donald Trump. But you can’t do both."
Writing at Townhall, Pat Buchanan offers a different viewpoint:
"For there is a plot afoot in The Washington Post Conservative Club to purge Trump from the Republican Party before the primaries begin."
“A political party has a right to … secure its borders,” asserts the Post’s George Will, “a duty to exclude interlopers.” Will wants The Donald “excommunicated” and locked out of all GOP debates until he kneels and takes a loyalty oath to the nominee.
“Marginalizing Trump” carries no risk of “alienating a substantial Republican cohort,” Will assures us, for these “Trumpites” are neither Republicans nor conservatives. Better off without such trash.
The Post’s Michael Gerson says “establishment Republicans” must “make clear that [Trump] has moved beyond the boundaries of serious and civil discourse.” He loathes the Trumpites as much as Will.
Trump’s followers are “xenophobic,” Gerson tells CNN. They have a “resentment of outsiders, of Mexico, of China, and immigrants. That’s more like a European right-wing party, a UKIP or a National Front in France. Republicans can’t incorporate that.”
But if the GOP has no room for Trump’s followers, it has no future. For there simply aren’t that many chamber-of-commerce and country-club Republicans.
I’m sure that this is a debate that will continue for some time, but I wonder if it will end as the GOP establishment seems to think it will?
Does anyone else remember when, back in the day Will portrayed himself as a True Conservative and faithful Conservative while calling George H.W. Bush a “lapdog” for the GOP Establishment?
I’d love to see someone confront Will with that particular bit of irony.
Who are you talking about?
I see topics and positions presented on FR as original material presented on MSM and some of the more popular blogs from time to time. Not as bad as in the old 2nd term Clinton days when it was a regular occurrence on a mailing list I was on.
George Will has become nothing more than an ankle biter. A little short noisy ankle biter.
George Will. Was supposed to be responding to #1.
Exactly— the polls show Trump is leading among self-described conservatives. The whole premise of Will’s opinion is fallacious.. Also Trump leads among Tea-partiers.. How do you write something that is nationally syndicated and put so little effort into your argument..
Trump should say to Will what Buckley said to Gore Vidal.
“Purge”, George? How Nazi of you! Typical socialist!
Karl Rove
Michael Medved
Dana PeRINO
Jebbifer Rubin
Matt Lewis
David Brooks
Charles Krauthammer
These people are on the payroll of The Cheap Labor Express and are against the rule of law and the citizens.
They are certainly not conservatives.
It is not conservative to abandon the rule of law.
These people all advocate surrendering the country to fraudulently documented foreigners.
Political consultants are picking our candidates - - they've destroyed 'bench strength' for democrats... and could do the same for us.
The perfect candidate from the perspective of a political consultant is one who looks good on TV, doesn't make waves, and is happy to do what the consultant tells him to do: "Spend THIS amount on TV ads in Florida - and be grateful I'm not taking a higher percentage"...
What's right for the political consultant is WRONG for the country. Incentives from hell...
George Will's a smart man - he needs to rethink this one.
The more the RINOS squeal the better Trump looks.
George and his bitter clinging Willnots.
The media, Bammy and the DemRats control the GOPe. SO the GOPe tries to lord it over their perceived ‘weak sister conservatives’. Only this time Georgie boy the ‘weak sister’ has morphed into a Rhonda Rousey type. Get with the program old man.
George, no one will remember you when you’re dead..
Much is said about how dems keep blacks on their political plantation. I contend the same is true of blue collar, middle class conservatives. We are on the GOPe plantation.
The republican party elites look down their noses at the grass roots American who actually believes in God, Family and Constitutionally protected liberty.
As Will said, they have been working hard for decades to make conservatism palatable.
And George Will’s chin pulling erudition has accomplished exactly... what?
The establishment he’s a part of is completely worthless. They have achieved ZERO in the last 20 years.
Time for change.
That lunatic’s career deserves to tank——and yesterday.
Absolutely disgusting.
No Trump fan here, but the more I hear from the likes of George Will, the more I seriously consider changing my mind about my position...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.