Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: I'll rescind birthright citizenship
Washington Examiner ^ | 8/16/15 | Barbara Boland

Posted on 08/16/2015 10:35:33 AM PDT by markomalley

Donald Trump plans to undo President Obama's executive orders on immigration, get rid of birthright citizenship, and deport all undocumented immigrants if he is elected president, he said Sunday.

Birthright citizenship "remains the biggest magnet for illegal immigration," Trump said in his 6-page immigration policy report titled "Immigration Reform That Will Make America Great Again."

Speaking to NBC's Chuck Todd aboard his gilded private plane on "Meet the Press" Sunday, Trump said of the current illegal immigrants in the country, "We're going to keep the families together, but they have to go."

When Todd questioned where they would go if they have nowhere to return to, Trump repeated, "We will work with them. They have to go. Chuck, we either have a country, or we don't have a country."

Trump said that Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., helped him come up with specific policies on immigration, and that he will streamline the process for becoming a legal citizen. He plans to triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, require companies to hire American workers first and mandate nationwide e-certify usage, among other measures.

"Before any new green cards are issued to foreign workers abroad, there will be a pause where employers will have to hire from the domestic pool of unemployed immigrant and native workers," the report outlines.

In the report, Trump reiterates that he will make Mexico pay for the wall. He plans to do this by impounding "remittance payments derived from illegal wages," increasing "fees on all temporary visas issued to Mexican CEOs and diplomats" and fees on border crossing cards, North American Free Trade Agreement worker visas from Mexico and fees at ports of entry to the United States from Mexico.

"We will not be taken advantage of anymore," Trump said.

Obama's executive order that protects illegal immigrants' children, called Dreamers, from deportation, "we have to" rescind, Trump told Todd on Sunday.

"We have to make a whole new set of standards and when people come in, they have to come in legally," he said.

Trump said he will fix the immigration system so that illegal immigrants who work could quickly return — legally.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; anchorbabies; birthright; donaldtrump; immigration; kingdonald; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Repeal The 17th

The 100 member Trump court!


21 posted on 08/16/2015 11:33:02 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Which has been judicially interpreted as including the children of those present without permission.

How could you interpret it? The language is pretty straightforward.

22 posted on 08/16/2015 11:36:04 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: knarf; HiTech RedNeck

“...100 member court...”
-
Newt Gingrich; Andrew Napolitano; hell, I’ll even take Judge Judy!


23 posted on 08/16/2015 11:39:44 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

No more anchor babies!


24 posted on 08/16/2015 11:57:25 AM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reform

Read this….he wins..


25 posted on 08/16/2015 12:04:18 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Yea.. Just do it by Executive Order. This birth right is ridiculous.


26 posted on 08/16/2015 12:23:53 PM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Sounds to me like exclusive jurisdiction is intended. I.e. these are “our” people and not “someone else’s” people.


27 posted on 08/16/2015 12:44:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Sounds to me like exclusive jurisdiction is intended. I.e. these are “our” people and not “someone else’s” people.

... again in context, this was about freedmen.


28 posted on 08/16/2015 12:45:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
TRUMP'S LOOKING BETTER AND BETTER AND BETTER!!!!!
29 posted on 08/16/2015 12:48:22 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("The politicians scattered like roaches" ~Ann Coulter" (Insult to roaches ~SB))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hattie
Or...you don't even have to strip them of citizenship. Just say hey, you may be a citizen, but you're parents aren't, and they're getting deported. You can choose to take your kid back home with you or surrender parental rights and leave him here to be adopted. If you leave him here, the adoption records are expunged and you never get to contact him again.

And...whether he stays or goes, he, as citizen and legal resident will NEVER be granted the preference to bring you back like other legal residents get with family members. (The preference part is policy, not law, as far as I know, so it shouldn't be hard to change, and even if it is, get Congress to pass a bill enacting it into law)

30 posted on 08/16/2015 12:50:05 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!Just read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

“...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..”

are persons who cross the border and enter the country illegally “subject to the jurisdiction?”


31 posted on 08/16/2015 12:57:05 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Look up the word “Preposterous” (cross reference: cart before the horse) to describe the attempt to use this to declare these persons to be citizens.


32 posted on 08/16/2015 1:13:34 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
are persons who cross the border and enter the country illegally “subject to the jurisdiction?”

If they shoot someone do you just let them go because they are not subject to the jurisdiction?

33 posted on 08/16/2015 1:15:14 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

If he will do it. He’ll be the greatest President in history. I want to see his position on guns first.


34 posted on 08/16/2015 1:24:19 PM PDT by BigCinBigD (...Was that okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

This isn’t the question. The question is how does this end up implying full blown citizenship.


35 posted on 08/16/2015 1:25:25 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD

If Trump is wise and wants the political momentum he will take a libertarian stance here.


36 posted on 08/16/2015 1:26:06 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
This isn’t the question. The question is how does this end up implying full blown citizenship.

That question has to go to the Supremes. I don't think Trump will be able to anything about it himself. I imagine that the court as configured today would rule citizenship.

37 posted on 08/16/2015 1:34:56 PM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

Yes, like it ruled “gay marriage.” Trump is going to need a chapter in his plan dealing with how to get such eight balls out of the way.


38 posted on 08/16/2015 1:37:10 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

And it’s also possible that law could be amended. What, for example, currently excludes the children of foreign ambassadors physically born here? It isn’t a constitutional thing. It has to be a law thing.


39 posted on 08/16/2015 1:38:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

40 posted on 08/16/2015 1:40:38 PM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson