Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/14/2015 4:48:34 PM PDT by Faith Presses On
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Faith Presses On

2 posted on 08/14/2015 4:52:10 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Every bit of correspondence from the sitting Secy. of State must be considered Top Secret until it has been properly vetted. Her excuses are as lame as Billy Jeff’s used to be. Jail time should be the result.


3 posted on 08/14/2015 4:52:58 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

Could Barack Hussein Obama could a security clearance?

Serious question.


4 posted on 08/14/2015 4:54:43 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
Hmmm 12 yrs in Submarines, Qualified Sonar Supervisor, Secret Control PO during the Walker hoopla, holding Higher than TS, this is all basic stuff. But wait, I'm a regular person...not a Clinton hahaha
5 posted on 08/14/2015 5:01:44 PM PDT by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy - proud NRA member & Certified Instructor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

7 posted on 08/14/2015 5:06:53 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: bringing joy to the hearts of Terrorists everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

I held a TS clearance in my four years in the AF 66-70. There are features of the system of classification that even now I would not discuss. I worked for AFSA which comes under NSA. I took an oath and I maintain it.


11 posted on 08/14/2015 5:11:59 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
Aside from being a retired Jumpmaster, Army Sys Admin, and Department of State Information Management Specialist during the Clinton Sec State stint (also there for Colin Powell and Condi Rice)... I have also been an IG Investigations and Assistance NCOIC, so:

The Chief Information Officer and the head of Diplomatic Security should face jail time. The Office of Diplomatic Security oversees all IT Security, per the Foreign Service Manual and Foreign Service publications.

What Hillary Clinton did having an Email server is illegal.

All diplomatic computer systems on the what the rest of governments knows as Unclassified is Sensitive but Unclassified and is considered an offense to simply forward any communications or information to an outside or non-government computer, unless approved by the Information Systems Security Officer or the Regional Security Officer. SBU is considered a higher classification that Unclassified.

A private server with any type of state department message or email traffic is illegal for any purpose.

All Stated Department SBU or higher network data is dual encrypted. Once it leaves a State Department Network it is no longer protected.

I believe Hillary utilized this server to transfer illegally State Department communications to foreign powers and business associates in foreign countries. Why else would so money transit her Charity Organization at the same time certain actions were required for approval at State?

Hillary and her inner circle should all face jail time. They are no different than Snowden or that nasty transgender private in Leavenworth... They have committed treason.

12 posted on 08/14/2015 5:13:13 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

In short, possession of classified material, deemed classified or not, it is the holder’s responsibility to recognize the material’s significance and protect it. Possession is not only prosecutable, but must be prosecuted.

Hillary’s magic wand will be working overtime ...


13 posted on 08/14/2015 5:13:15 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

As a former TS/SCI/SI type, anything government related is required to be processed on a gov server/system. To use private comms while serving in a public position is just asking for indictment of “what are you trying to hide”?

She ain’t the queen, never will be.


15 posted on 08/14/2015 5:14:54 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

What everyone with more than half a brain in their heads knows - or should know: someone in the position of Secretary of State is for certain at one time or another, and probably practically every day, going to be receiving and generating classified government information - and this can’t be transmitted over a private, unsecured email system....


16 posted on 08/14/2015 5:17:39 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

And this is coming from a state dept guy. State was known to play fast and loose with security issues as a general rule.


20 posted on 08/14/2015 5:36:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

23 posted on 08/14/2015 6:08:55 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

“I held a Top Secret clearance at the State Department for 24 years and was regularly trained in protecting information as part of that privilege.”

Dear Mr. Van Buren:

IF that is true then you know that you should not be advertising it, you FRIGGIN’ FOOL! You are just as bad as Hitlery!


27 posted on 08/14/2015 6:24:16 PM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian, political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

It’s called “spillage” and yes it is a very big deal.


32 posted on 08/14/2015 6:49:04 PM PDT by XRdsRev (New Jersey - Crossroads of the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On


The emphasis throughout the classification system is not on strict legalities and coded markings, but on judgment. In essence, employees are required to know right from wrong. It is a duty, however subjective in appearance, one takes on in return for a security clearance.

“Not knowing” would be an unexpected defense from a person with years of government experience.

The Clintons never displayed the ability to tell right from wrong. Deny, deny, deny


34 posted on 08/14/2015 7:08:09 PM PDT by griswold3 (Just another unlicensed nonconformist in am dangerous Liberal world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On
This information, they said, “should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system.”

Personal is irrelevent with regard to classified information. A personal system should not be used for ANY official government business, even unclassified business.

35 posted on 08/14/2015 7:13:35 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

The day before Obama leaves the Whtie house, she will get a full pardon and immunity from any future charges.


36 posted on 08/14/2015 7:16:47 PM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Faith Presses On

This EVIL MONSTROUS BITCH ON WHEELS would have us rubes believe that carrying 2 phones was just too hard a task.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-phones-secretary-state-now/story?id=29535505

“When Hillary Clinton began her term as secretary of state in 2009, she thought it would be “easier,” “better,” “simpler” and more convenient to “carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two,” she said repeatedly at a news conference today, with slight variations in wording.

“Looking back, it would’ve been better for me to use two separate phones and two email accounts,” Clinton told reporters at the United Nations. “I thought using one device would be simpler and, obviously, it hasn’t worked out that way.


38 posted on 08/14/2015 7:21:29 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson