Posted on 08/14/2015 7:46:15 AM PDT by Bluewater2015
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina said Thursday that parents should not be forced to vaccinate their children against diseases like measles or mumps. However, she said she also believes schools should be free to make vaccinations for communicable diseases a requirement for attendance, saying families have to "make that trade-off" for themselves.
Fiorina told reporters after the event that "when you have highly communicable diseases where you have a vaccine that's proven, like measles or mumps, then I think a parent can make that choice."
California, where Fiorina ran for a Senate seat against Democrat Barbara Boxer in 2010, recently passed a law requiring nearly all schoolchildren to be vaccinated. Several calls to tighten the state's vaccine laws erupted after a measles outbreak last December was found to have originated in Disneyland.
Fiorina expressed her disapproval of the mandate, saying that "California is wrong on most everything, honestly."
(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...
The entire pattern of of infectious disease vectors backs me up to the max.
Epidemics follow vaccination programs, not the reverse.
.
.
>> “That’s a really good question. In most cases it makes sense to defer to an expert.” <<
.
And doctors are experts at spreading disease!
Note that statistically, Hospitals are the most common place for people to catch an infection in the western world.
.
The difference with that analogy is tort. Everyone involved in the airplane flying business is liable to tort should something happen. NO one in the vaccine business at any point is liable to tort.
Factor that into your decision as well.
Good thing you started your lie with “Mumbo jumbo!”
All infectious disease follows vectors leading outward from points of initiation.
Is that hard for you to grasp?
.
.
Well said!
You really could try to tone down the ridiculous pretentious pomp. Is that supposed to represent Christ or you?
Many or even much is not all.
You didn’t have to jump off that cliff!
Not all?
If not, then how would they be infectious?
Amazing.
Tracking devices have to have a receiver and integer solving processor to develop position. Then, they have to also have a transmitter, which will require considerable power to remain in operation.
Such a device could not be hidden under your skin.
A passive Faraday loop chip that could signal its presence to various sensors as one passes by them would be the closest thing to tracking that could be embedded in your skin.
.
.
>> “They have not been infected with the active form of the disease” <<
.
Now there is some real Mumbo Jumbo.
not with current technology but with alien tecnology they recovered in the spacraft in Roswell... ...just pullin your leg....LOL
Ya had me going for a moment...
That's probably what some leftists are thinking, deep down.
I have no doubt at all.
Yes, Leaning Right, that's an excellent point. Doctors have been sued for "failure to immunize." Here's a list of lawsuits (PDF file):
http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p2060.pdf
So, yeah, I don't blame doctors for recommending vaccinations. They could be sued if they don't.
Sued if they don’t, indemnified if they do. Is it any wonder they push them?
Yep. It’s no wonder.
Well, and for peds, there is an extra payout at the end of the year for them if their patient load is 95%+ fully vaxed. So there’s financial consideration over and above the tort as well.
Wow.
Of course, many doctors probably would recommend vaccinations, even without the payouts.
But, any doctor on the fence is sure to be swayed by the payouts and the possibility of a lawsuit.
Yes your arrogant manner is amazing. Why are you claiming to represent Christ. Christ is not about you.
I hate listening to all those alien nutcase theorists. They make for great entertainment though...lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.