Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did The EPA Intentionally Poison Animas River To Secure SuperFund Money?
Zerohedge ^ | August 12, 2015 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 08/12/2015 8:36:02 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian

A week before The EPA disastrously leaked millions of gallons of toxic waste into The Animas River in Colorado, this letter to the editor was published in The Silverton Standard & The Miner local newspaper, authored by a retired geologist detailing verbatim, how EPA would foul the Animas River on purpose in order to secure superfund money...

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: animasriver; animus; bhoepa; colorado; coloradoepaspill; epa; epaminespill; epaoutofcontrol; epasuperfund; epatoxicwastewater; erinbrockovich; goldkingmine; lettertoeditor; navajonation; pollution; tylerdurden; tylerdurdenmyass; water; zerohedge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Hojczyk
"the FEDS are nothing but a RICO racket...EPA has 17,000 employees doing what...killing the country one rule at a time.."

BUMP

41 posted on 08/12/2015 11:56:41 AM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

Thanks. Posting this on my Facebook.


42 posted on 08/12/2015 12:26:00 PM PDT by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: george76

Also sending it to Drudge. This needs to go viral.


43 posted on 08/12/2015 12:29:08 PM PDT by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Holly cow Batman. That means the EPA really are terrorist.


44 posted on 08/12/2015 1:24:35 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Is anybody genuinely surprised at this ...uh...possibility?

I think not.

Ayn Rand was an optimist; George Orwell was a realist.


45 posted on 08/12/2015 1:30:32 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Mike Rosen read this letter before the top of the hour. Took one call and moved on to a guest. Shame that.


46 posted on 08/12/2015 1:40:28 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Yes.

>> Shame that


47 posted on 08/12/2015 1:46:51 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kaila

http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847

Editor verifies here that it was published.


48 posted on 08/12/2015 1:53:32 PM PDT by Chickensoup (We lose our freedoms one surrender at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kaila

http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847

editor verified here that it was published


49 posted on 08/12/2015 1:54:01 PM PDT by Chickensoup (We lose our freedoms one surrender at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreedomOfExpression

http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847

Editor verified here that it was published.


50 posted on 08/12/2015 1:54:38 PM PDT by Chickensoup (We lose our freedoms one surrender at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

http://www.silvertonstandard.com/news.php?id=847

Editor verified here that it was published


51 posted on 08/12/2015 1:55:09 PM PDT by Chickensoup (We lose our freedoms one surrender at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
From Natural Process, Chapter 1, copyright 2001: When taking land out of production profits the financial sponsors of a claim, it is cheaper to control the target use than to compensate the owner or buy the property. All it takes to manipulate a resource market by democratic means is to buy out the competition by manipulating majority perceptions about the risk of ecological harm associated with that target use. The few who can profit by taking competing resources out of production then have reason to sponsor the investment in political or legal action. They focus the first case against a weak target or obvious problem (which is why most such takings appear as local actions).

Established precedent then extends the applicability of cited legislation and lowers the cost successive claims. Property owners gradually lose their ability to finance the cost of com¬pliance or legal resistance. Absent a profitable use, the market value of the target use approaches zero. After repeated exercise of external con¬trols, pur¬chase of the residual asset value concludes any remaining claim by an owner.

When a rival owner produces a competing or substitute good, the financial advantages of such tacit property acquisitions can be enormous. For example, if a developer funded public concerns about the negatively valued transfor¬mation products of farming to render the use of farmland non-economic and ripe for development, the land becomes less expensive to purchase.

This politically-sponsored dissolution of the Separation of Powers Principle, combines all three branches of government into one, that can derive power and funding by manufacturing claims on the use of property. The more exter¬nalities are regulated, the more power accrues to the agency to control the use of the producing asset to turn its use to corrupt purpose. When agency control is sufficient to alienate the interest of the agent from the democratic majority, the asset has then degenerated into a socialized commons.

The claims by which a commons is socialized are ironically often the same precedents as were used to extend the original democratic claim; i.e., by ex¬tending claims against the transformation products of the democratic use of the resource. With the legal precedents in place that were used to take control of the factors of production on individual property, the civic agent now has the legal tools to take control of ALL related private property. Control of the use of land is now in the hands of an agency that is alienated from accountability to the public claim for healthy ecosystem function. The agency instead serves the limited interests of the politically dominant, who use the power of government to gain de facto control of ALL factors of production.

History teaches that this is not a good thing.

A socialized commons is an evil to the environment because the resource is under a controlling agent with no structural motive to prevent or eliminate ecological problems. Quite the contrary, civic management of the environ¬ment not only doesn’t work, it has every reason not to work. As eco¬logical problems worsen and resulting economic crises deepen, the power acceded to government agencies expands!

Commons are factor inputs to all economic goods. The power to socialize commons by regulation is the power to transfer control of ALL factors of production to government.


52 posted on 08/12/2015 1:58:23 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Yes, I remember! I pinged you first, remembering all the times you told all of us that we needed to sue these people under the RICO statutes, but I don’t think it ever got done, sadly.


53 posted on 08/12/2015 2:25:45 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Help Stamp Out Pernicious Progressives and Arrogant Activists With Their Liberalism!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

“There are too many untouchable bureaucrats who believe they are above the law and can do anything they want.”

Who will step up and show them different?


54 posted on 08/12/2015 2:49:49 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I watched Beck for a while. Thought he was a little loony, but what got me was how emotional he always seemed to get. So I stopped watching. But, man o man, he did seem to be on the right track with a lot of his stuff back in his Fox days. All of this, obama wanting to forcefully integrate neighborhoods..all seem to be part of that Agenda 21 crap he talked about years ago.


55 posted on 08/12/2015 4:07:51 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

The Navajos will get a zillion dollars out of a high-study area, too. And lawyers to sue the mining companies, too. It will bring a lot of money to the res. Hope this geologist goes public and stays there. This was a chilling letter.


56 posted on 08/12/2015 4:49:46 PM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

I have wondered that also.

Of course, they caused a huge amount of damage that will probably lead to long term health issues, businesses closing, and depopulation of the affected area.

But they get their funding.


57 posted on 08/12/2015 7:10:48 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

"Moi? Non!"
58 posted on 08/12/2015 8:14:59 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

When are we going to say enough. This sludge will make it’s way down to my County. The war on the West is ongoing...it never ends. Just when you’re done with one fight, they’re waging another. What they want is complete domination..and they are winning.


59 posted on 08/12/2015 10:30:58 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge
This is what they do. The Agencies have taken over Washington and because there is no budget, it only grows. All last year I fought the US Fish and Wildlife Service for ending a 50 year mitigation trout stocking program in the Colorado River that would have been devastating to the economy in my District (I am a County Supervisor). And it's not like we could have taken it over, because they don't let you.. THEY CONTROL THE COLORADO RIVER, if you can believe it. It's all about the endangered species that nobody cares about and nobody, not one agency worker, can explain to me why they are important. Boneytail chubs and razorback suckers. When I asked a mid level worker what was so important about the fish you know what he said? JOB SECURITY. He had the audacity to look us in the face and say that. I testified in front of Congress, twice, begging them to just follow their own laws. I can write a book about how this thing went down. We won. But not without a huge cost.

Now they are trying to stop hunting and the fight goes on. Now this sludge is heading our way. It's all a plan to bring the West to its knees.

Please help us in our fight to take back our public lands. It's really our only hope. You can get all the information at
AMERICAN LANDS COUNCIL.

60 posted on 08/12/2015 10:52:11 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson