[Gaffer]

I see a title that says "essential". Yet, I see words in the narrative that say "material that would otherwise be thrown out plays a vital role in the potential to advance research and cure disease. Finally topping off their laundry list of 'should, coulds, and woulds' with "if researchers can't use fetal 'tissue' work could go slowly, slowly, slowly.

I don't know about anyone else out there, but if there are 'researchers' out there who are saying these things, let's have their damned names and who they work for? Let's get them to tell us what disease their use of the remains of a dead baby actually cured a disease.

Let's get them to tell us about ALL the research, even possibly [I'll use their journalistic style here] research that doesn't have anything to do with curing disease - for instance, can they tell us with absolute verification they don't do work for cosmetic firms, or other companies that want to develop products to get rid of wrinkles, bags under the eyes, grow hair or extend life?

Names, places of employment, who pays them, for WHAT and how much. Tell us about the whole list of diseases and why it is so important to cause the abortion industry to gear up so extensively to become an overnight meat delivery service.

It's disgusting and I'm tired of hearing nebulous excuses from unnamed ghouls. Come on out from under that rock and show us who you are.

[Adder]

Excellent post.

I was a mite curious to know just what vaccine was developed that could not have been made any other way.

I agree: make these people come out from the rocks and slime pits and stop making could/should statements as if they are factual.