Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

It is also arguable that the bombs saved Japanese lives, likely over a million. If a conventional invasion had gone forward, many more Japanese would have died than did at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Anyone with knowledge of what happened in the fight for Okinawa understands this. The Japanese casualties, both military and civilian, were horrific, and the main home islands would have been Okinawa writ large.

Only ideologues and the historically ignorant think the bombs didn’t save lives.


15 posted on 08/08/2015 4:45:22 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomPoster

I’d hazard to guess that the estimated “one million Japanese lives saved” would translate to many many more in the 70 years since then. Why? Because if that 1 million had been sacrificed to hopeless defeat and death to end the war, they would not have “gone forth and multiplied.”

They got what they deserved. What they begged for.


18 posted on 08/08/2015 5:04:11 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomPoster

It is also very likely that Hokkaido and the eastern half of Honshu would have been invaded by Soviet forces (at our explicit invitation) resulting in a situation parallel to East and West Germany and North and South Korea. Instead we in the west had the enormous human talents of the Japanese, pacified and focused on technological innovations for the benefit of the world, and a military base of operations off the coast of Asia, all to ourselves.


26 posted on 08/08/2015 5:15:26 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson