Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FlingWingFlyer

Planned Parenthood is less about “women’s health” than it is about providing the last ditch form of birth control for those women who fail to practice adequate contraception. Unless rape is involved, the woman is in control of what happens in these situations.

The so-called “Women’s Liberation Movement” has essentially given license to women to be as sexually active as many men in this degenerating culture. If you need help conceptualizing or visualizing that, think the sleazy TV production “Sex In The City”. I forced myself to watch a few episodes just to be sure what I’m about to say is as correct as it is politically incorrect. It portrays 4 quintessential women libbers who spend much of their time bed-hopping among various partners.

Putting aside the shared problem of STD’s borne by BOTH partners, until the Supreme Court decides that true equality demands that MEN also be allowed to give birth (we can expect that decision next term), women bear the unique consequence of a planning error or contraception failure called “pregnancy”. And the more sexually promiscuous they are, the greater the risk of a “planning error” or contraception failure and an unwanted pregnancy.

The “solution” to that “problem” came in 1973 in Roe v. Wade and the availability of abortions. Let’s call it what it really is: The killing of a baby in the former sanctity and safety of its mother’s womb.
Many folks don’t know this, but the plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, said that her greatest sin, greater even than her sins of selling drugs, cheating people and being an abusive alcoholic, was to be “the plaintiff in Roe V. Wade.” In repentance, she was baptized by a fundamentalist minister and joined the anti-abortion group, Operation Rescue. (She never DID have that abortion but delivered the baby and adopted it out.)

I recently watched FOX Network News commentator Charles Payne discuss the Planned Parenthood scandal. He echoed the very sentiment with which I planned to close this rant. If you don’t know him, Charles is a highly intelligent gentleman who overcame a hardknock ghetto youth to become a successful investment adviser. He is also black. I note that simply to further legitimize his comment.

The token “progressive” member of the panel offered that Planned Parenthood performed not just abortions, but OTHER much needed “women’s health” services and defunding them and forcing them to halt abortion would cause them to close those nearby inner city facilities. Charles quickly responded that those non-abortion services were available from local hospitals and real health clinics. He added that the unavailability of quick and inexpensive abortions might have the effect of CAUSING THOSE INNER CITY GIRLS TO RETHINK THEIR SEXUAL ACTIVITIES. It might even help to bring some much needed stability back to those inner-city families.

In a nation where we have been killing babies for 42 years, this is just some grossly politically incorrect food for thought as we approach what I pray is the DEFUNDING of the euphemistically named Planned Parenthood.

Dick Bachert
8 1 2015


9 posted on 08/02/2015 9:06:56 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Dick Bachert
Planned Parenthood is less about “women’s health” than it is about providing the last ditch form of birth control for those women who fail to practice adequate contraception. Unless rape is involved, the woman is in control of what happens in these situations.

I would take it a step further. Planned Parenthood is more about neutering situations that will inevitably lead to an abortion, enabling them to harvest viable organs from unborn children all while deceiving the public into believing that are performing some sort of service.

11 posted on 08/02/2015 9:24:25 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Yeah, to the feminazis and liberals (libertines) “equality” never meant raising the “oppressed” higher. It’s always about finding the lowest and most reprehensible behavior, and dragging everybody down to THAT.
So here we are in utopia, and we’re all “free” to do anything we want, and if any inconvenient children result, we can demand the state to feed them or kill them for us.


14 posted on 08/02/2015 9:42:48 AM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future; brother it is murder. -L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Excellent - thanks for posting....I’m sure Charles can expect to be called some unflattering names but BRAVO to him. He is a real sharp guy.


15 posted on 08/02/2015 10:04:39 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson