[Red in Blue PA]

James feels that investing in companies that trade in guns puts the $160 billion system at risk for lawsuits.

And what of pharmaceutical companies?

Or car companies?

Or hotel companies?

I could go on and on but you get the point.

[Kozy]

In a New York Times article last August, researchers painted the system as hamstrung by, “[A]n antiquated and inefficient governing structure that often permits politics to intrude on decisions.”

NYC can tell their pensioners when they run out of money that there is no conflict of interest when they apply for greeters’ jobs at Wal-Mart. Their forward thinking board resolved that issue in 2015.

[susanrey]

I can not agree your opinion more. The investment for the Drug companies and other companies are better than investing the gun companies, which may cause the damage to people. at present, we should pay more attention to the food and beverage, the nutrition, the environment(http://www.creative-proteomics.com/Application/Environment-Analysis-Service.htm) and other business, which is good for people. However, I think there is no need to invest in firearms companies, except for those, which are controlled by government.