Lesson for today:
1: Atmosphere has just 0.04% CO2 in it
2: Man creates just 3.4% of that 0.04% (The rest is natural)
3: Therefore, the atmosphere has just 0.00137% CO2 produced by man (3.4% of 0.04% = 0.00137%)
4: The silly idea that 0.00137% CO2 in the atmosphere can cause ANY change to our climate globally is LAUGHABLE!
Study Question: How can 0.00137% of our atmosphere possibly capture enough escaping heat, and then back radiate a fraction of that, in large enough quantities, towards earth, to cause climate change?
Bonus Points: IF CO2 causes climate change, then hy is it that CO2 ONLY rises AFTER many decades of climate change?
Bonus Question 2: IF CO2 causes climate change, why has there been ZERO climate change for 2 decades now despite more CO2 I nthe atmosphere each successive year during those 2 decades?
Bonus Question 3: Why are man-caused climate change LIARS allowed to open their LYING mouths in public?
Bonus FACT: man-caused climate change LIARS claim we are reaching record high ppm of CO2 In the atmosphere because of man, and that it cant possibly get that high naturally- therefore man is to blame- yet these LIARS ignore their own findings that show that ppm were much higher thousands of years ago (if you believe in long earth ages)
It’s ridiculous to contend that the current levels of CO2 are the cause of global warming. I think some of the proponents of global warming are sincere in their beliefs. CO2 is a greenhouse gas as is methane but there are so many factors in global climate that the predictions of AGW proponents is a hypothesis at best and no theory of climate exists. There are a great multitude of climate factors and no one understands the relations among them.
The political and economic ramifications of CO2 reductions are massive and also not clearly in view. It’s not to be mentioned who will benefit most my green industries. The poor of the world are, however, guaranteed to be harmed the most.
We have seen a rise from 280 to 400 ppm. The only way that could have happened is lots of CO2 venting from the crust or lots of warming in the ocean. We have had neither of those. Another possibility is a lot of vegetation loss but that has happened either.
The other problem with the "it's natural" theory is that the annual wiggle is obviously natural:
If that is natural, the year over year rise is probably not.
yet these LIARS ignore their own findings that show that ppm were much higher thousands of years ago (if you believe in long earth ages)
They don't ignore anything. There have been natural rises similar to the present rise as recently as 8 or 9000 years ago. But those were about 1/2 the present rise and had natural explanations.
All the logic confuses them.
Good global warming argument bump