In a perfect world, yes. With this administration, no.
Some people are above the law. Move on.
The shadow war between Team Clinton and Team Obama is heating up, but it has been going on for a long time.
I presume each side can threaten the other with destruction, which is why the battles are invisible.
Perhaps something has happened to give Valerie and Michelle the upper hand, who knows?
BUWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah right.
They must have dirt on damn near everyone...there is no other logical explaination for their constant skirting of the law.
White water,rape allegations, bimbo eruptions,fort marcy park....you name it...they slink away like snakes in the grass.
“the only way to be sure is to nuke the site from orbit”
“f’in eh”
Crimnal Probe? Criminal Probe?
Bwahahahahahaha, bwha, bwahahahahahaha, hahahahahahahaha,
oh please, stop it!
IMHO
With Loretta Lynch as attorney general??
No way.
SOME of Cankles ‘accomplishments’ :
--Fired for lying/obstructing justice during Watergate investigations
--Stated she was Named after Sir Edmund Hillary (before he was even known)
--Cattle futures deal
--White Water (Huge sordid list of scandals)
--Hillary Clinton is mentioned 36 times in a fraud indictment against Webster Hubbell (Castle Grande)
--Secretive, oppressive “HillaryHealthCare”
--Vince Foster / taking files from his WH office
--WACO and Janet Reno lovefest
--Ron Brown
--Number of times Hillary Clinton says "I don't recall" or its equivalent in a statement to a House investigating committee: 50. Number of paragraphs in this statement: 42
-- >900 FBI files
--Who hired Craig Livingston (WH Security)
--'Vast Right-wing conspiracy'
--Rose Law Firm billing records (Castle Grande development scam)
--Travel gate
--Created BJ Clinton ‘Bimbo Eruptions’
--Left White House with WH furniture/silverware
--Left the White House “dead broke”
--Billy BJ being a rapist --Hillary falsified statements to the Federal Election Commission about a large donation to her 2000 Senate campaign (Peter Paul)
--2008 Presidential campaign (Hillary Clinton fundraisers..Norman Hsu, Hassan Nemazee , Sant Singh Chatwal, all jailed )
--Huma Abedin - ties to Muslim Brotherhood
-- Hillary Paid Men more than Women on Her Own Staff!
--‘Reset Button’ Russia
--Lied about being shot at in Bosnia
--Hillary Clinton’s Syria/Libya/Israel/Egypt/Iraq/Iran/Palestine/ Ukraine/Poland/ Czech Republic/ Baltic states / Al Qaeda/ISIS/ Boko Haram/ incompetence dereliction of duty messes
--BENGHAZI (situations TOO numerous to compile)
--$6 Billion missing at State Dept
-- Hillary Clinton Broke all Federal Ethic Rules with a $500,000. Gift from Algeria
--Bill, Hillary, Chelsea Clinton Foundation receiving massive $ foreign contributions
--E-mail gate (private server/classified emails/deleted emails) all prohibited by Federal Law
--Hillary Clinton’s health, thyroid condition, alcoholism, blood clots (right transverse venous thrombosis), heart rhythm and heart valves conditions, fainting,
~~~ The Hillary Clinton Lies List ~~~
Planned Parenthood is selling aborted baby body parts, and the DOJ is going to investigate the organization that outed this information. That is all you need to know to answer the question of whether Hillary! will get away with her crimes.
It would seem to me that the reports of two Inspectors General regarding the matter would be enough for the Justice Department to indict her. Screw a ‘probe’. Go for the kill straight out.
Is Hell near freezing over?
Obama needs a Dem successor to “cement his legacy”. Hillary is too much of a risk regarding victory in 2016. My bet is ValJar is looking for a more stable candidate that can be manipulated into victory more easily than Hillary.
Of course, to do that, ValJar needs to get Hillary out of the way and fast.
If that happens - Hillary will release everything she has on Barry - his bathhouse habits, Reggie Love, Franklin Marshall Davis to mention a few - it will be the most famous stalemate we've never heard about.
IS A CRIMINAL PROBE OF CLINTON NEAR?
A resounding NO!
If the Democrats win the election there will be no probe.
If the Republicans win the election there will be no probe.
Life will continue just the way it has been going...”one political hand washing the other political hand.”
You have to remember...each party holds enough “dirt” on the other that no one is going to open that “can of worms.” And...besides that...she a female (if you want to call it that) and it’s simply not FAIR to pick on her.
NYT published the article on the 23rd, then published a correction on the 24th and a second correction on the 25th and the story began falling apart.
Yesterday, the NYT editor admitted they had it all wrong because their anonymous source had deceived the NYT reporters.
Now, everybody wants to know who the anonymous source was. Trey Gowdy?
Id say the photos coming in from Pluto are a good metaphor for the nearness of such a thing
It is possible. Diabolically, here’s how IMHO:
* an indictment would be from a black chief justice, whereby proving beyond a shadow of doubt that she is free of bias, and, the msm would then say this on every sunday show putting it to bed (of course i am angered by this and would not believe it; this is their storyline, not mine)
* an indictment would eliminate hillary whereby for those who believe our deal leader wants a pubbie to win so he can be blamed for everything (i do buy this theory)
* possibly to get hillary out of the way for warren or biden or other (i still think he wants a pubbie to win)
* to create part of a scenario of chaos to declare martial law; timing would be with yellen raising rates 2-3pts (yes, that much) to make markets collapse here and abroad
In any case, dear leader would not be blamed, thus, Rush’s theory still intact.
“Is a criminal probe of Clinton near?”
Not a chance. Someone apparently still believes what they were taught in high school civics.
She is in a lot of trouble politically already whether it becomes legal or not.
