Only one?
This is a Dorkbama/Kerry fiasco.
It is a googol of flaws.
At a minimum.
Where would a “veto” come in to the Senate duty to accept or reject. That is not subject to Presidential action, though of course politics is vulnerable to Presidential clowning.
This writer is out to lunch. Obama wants Iran to have nukes and is seeing to it.
Bialosky, like so many others, doesn’t understand Obama’s intent at all.
This is an arms transfer agreement, at its core, wrapped in the cloak of arms control language.
God willing, we will get regime change in the USA, and be done with these treasonous bastards like Obama and Kerry and their quest to destroy this country. And yes, Iran needs regime change as well.
There is no deal to “stifle” Iran’s nuclear program. It is the complete opposite and while most of us see it here, it surprises me that so few in even the “conservative” media see it.
This agreement does the precise opposite. It provides Iran with a window allowing them to develop nukes unmolested. We guarantee the safety of their program. We undertake to make sure that not only will we not stop them, we will protect them from anyone else who might try to stop them. And we undertake to provide $160 billion dollars to fund their program.
This agreement is the precise opposite of how it is presented to be. The Obama regime has sided with Iran. The regime has sided against Israel. So why do we not get anything for doing so? Because America is still Iran’s enemy, despite the regime’s alliance with them. That should tell you that the regime is also America’s enemy and has been from day one.
As some have pointed out, the Obama regime is now the number one “state sponsor of terrorism” in the world. Now think back to exactly how ISIS (or ISIL as the regime prefers to call them) was born.
It’s amazing how much the Democrats have changed. Roosevelt and Truman demanded the unconditional surrender OF our enemies, but Obama surrenders TO them.
Flaw? As in singular; only one?
Flaws!
Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”
Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”
“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.
The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.
In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”
Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
__________________________________________
|
|||||||||
We propped up the Soviet Union too. Why should we treat mad-dog Islamists any differently? /s
If the mullahs stay in character they will go full speed on their nuke and delivery system acquisition and then launch against Tel Aviv and either DC or New York. Iran will cease to exist shortly thereafter as the IDF subs all launch their Samsons. Israel will be crippled and subject to immediate invasion from its neighbors unless those Dastardly Jews have anti missile capability we know not yet of.
and his actions will have the rest of us glowing from radiation!
We seem to have forgotten how all this played out with the Norks. The Iranians haven’t. In fact, they were taking notes.
