Posted on 07/25/2015 4:20:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
Jeb Bush is a fan. Ditto for Rand Paul and Marco Rubio. Hillary Clinton isn’t so sure. Martin O’Malley says it exposes the need to update our labor laws. Everyone is talking about Uber these days. The topic has even become part of the presidential election.
Full disclosure: I’m also a fan. I travel a lot. When I am away from home I typically use Uber cars if they are available. When I do, I often ask the drivers how they like working with Uber. I have never had one complain.
The most common comment from Uber drivers: they like the flexibility of the arrangement. They can work whenever they want to work. They can work as many hours as they want to work. If they need more income, they can work more. If they don’t, they are free to work less. What’s not to like?
A lot apparently. But the critics aren’t connected to Uber. They are sitting on the sidelines and griping. They are upset because Uber is challenging their view of how the world should work. Chief among these critics are labor union leaders. But they also include the editorial writers for The New York Times. The problem? Uber drivers aren’t actually “employees.” They are “independent contractors” for the purposes of federal labor law.
For example, an editorial in the Times last Sunday complains that:
There is a long history of businesses that try to deprive workers of the protections and benefits they are entitled to under the law by wrongly treating them as independent contractors, rather than employees.
If you perform services for other people, there are basically two sets of laws: labor law and common law. If you are an independent contractor your relationship with people you work for is completely contractual. Neither buyers nor sellers have any obligations other than what has been agreed to. If you are an employee, however, there are laws governing the minimum amount you must be paid, how many hours you can work without a change in pay, etc.
Remember, Uber is a pass through entity. It connects buyers and sellers. The real exchange is between rider and driver. So let’s forget Uber the company for a moment and consider what would happen if we subjected Uber riders and Uber drivers to traditional labor law.
For one thing, Uber drivers would be in violation of labor law if their income per hour worked doesn’t at least match the federal minimum wage. Then, if they worked more than 40 hours they would be in violation if the extra hours didn’t generate at least 50 percent more income per hour than their normal rate. They would be forced to contribute to workers compensation insurance scheme and pay unemployment insurance taxes.
On the buyer side, Uber encourages you to rate its drivers from one to five stars and drivers get bonuses based on these ratings. But if labor law applied, you would have a new set of worries. What if some sharp plaintiff’s lawyer discovered there was a pattern in your ratings? Suppose a statistically significant difference turned up in the way you rated black drivers versus whites? Or men versus women? Or, old versus young? Or, Christian versus Muslim or some other religion?
Statistics teaches us that even if you handed out rating stars randomly, five percent of the time a spurious correlation will emerge. And that could land you in court.
Notice that in going through these hypotheticals, I am completely ignoring “the firm.” In doing so, we find out that what The New York Times calls “benefits and protections” are actually burdens. This is consistent with economic theory. When the government taxes labor or when it regulates labor the burden doesn’t fall on companies. The burden falls on customers and on the workers themselves.
The Uber phenomenon is part of what is called the “gig economy.” Modern technology is making it possible to satisfy our needs in new and exciting ways. The prospects are truly breathtaking – unless government stands in the way.
While I am sure that UBER is probably, in many ways, a fine company, the reason why you would not hear complaints is because a driver who is caught complaining would be swiftly dispatched.
Complaining could result in the less than 4 star rating which could result in termination.
It’s an Atlas Shrugged world. If your business is successful, it will be crushed.
Why complain if you appreciate the opportunity? Conversely, why do the work if you do not like it?
As to being dispatched for complaining, you do not understand the nature of the relationship between driver and dispatcher.For the Uber driver it is “my car, my choice, when, where and how.” The driver is under no obligation to serve a client who makes him uncomfortable.
The big complaint is by taxi owners who pay upwards of $1 million for a license and hire drivers to stay on the street 24/7. It is a cut throat business with high rates and surly service. UBER has broken into that closed shop with better, cheaper, more satisfying service.
There’s a gray line here that government cannot afford to clarify. If you’re a subcontractor you get all the business advantages of a sole proprietor which include major tax cuts and a lifestyle improvement not available to the highly regulated and taxed employee.
Employees are treated like children and their allowance is managed by the corporation to government’s benefit. A sub can write off a whole lot of costs before claiming a salary.
I’m pretty sure drivers are exempt from overtime pay:
http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/screen75.asp
Technically, today, it's more common for people to be wage slaves -- no one owns you, but no one cares for your needs (except yourself), and your labor is yours to sell, but it's a buyer's market.
In reality, we are all government slaves -- owned and controlled by the state, our needs somewhat met by Social Services, our property is not our own, and our labor is thoroughly regulated.
Uber is an example of free labor which allows people to work gigs and control their own lives. There are downsides. But (in theory) individuals have a good amount of control over their own lives. They are not slaves of any kind.
Big Business and Big Government hate Uber.
Sure looks like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.