Even though it was a theoretical problem from way back, people let it ride because for a long time, the agreement in American morality was very great.
Now that the moral shark has been jumped numerous times, and finally in a way that will get in our face, the people may wake from their torpor.
Getting the right people onto it is important, but also important is not keeping the wrong people on it.
Through multiple administrations, including ostensibly conservative ones, not one iota of Roe v Wade has been repealed. The leftist agenda has gone ahead at full press. Congress passes the buck to the SC, the SC can’t be held accountable as they have lifetime sinecures. If we don’t get a true conservative in the White House, and one who knows his appointees through and through, and get enough so-called conservatives in Congress to pass the appointee, what do we do? It seems to me that Roe v Wade tells the story.
And not only Roe v Wade, but the fact that the political leadership in “sanctuary cities” aren’t prosecuted for breaking the law of the land, for years now, and that the “justices” could have the gall to deliberately find a “right” for sodomites to “marry”, when they already had an equal right to marry a person of the opposite sex, which is what marriage is and has been since mankind has been on earth.
Also:
Repeal The 16th and 17th Amendments
Especially the 17th
[[Gallup published in late July a poll that showed that Republicans strongly disapprove of the Supreme Court,]]
Really? Then why aren’t they calling to have them impeached?
The Court is an important issue, but I don’t think we want to emphasize it. I’d rather elect President Cruz and then have the low-information liberals realize that he will restore the rule of law. If we warn America’s enemies, they will be more likely to vote.
USA: Adopting policies and laws that ensure self-destruction
It is a basic truism that when 5 Federal employees in black robes can reverse centeriese of written law, understanding, and practice to the effect no one untill just 13 years ago was in compliance with thier ‘new law’ that there can be no Constitution of law. But merely the arrgoances of olgarchs.
The unfortunate reality is we eyther resit nullify, and overturn edicts like this or there is not Rule of law in this country. That is the stakes like it or not, supporter of the case or not.
I for one actually disagree with most on Dread Scott, and agree with the court but not with what people said the court did which of course would have been clearly unconstitutional. What I agree with is that the Territory of the United States did not have the authority to free a slave by act of its laws as such laws were limited by the bill of rights, and that slave’s terms of bondage were subject to property.
If Dred Scott simply had brought his case before the Illinois State Government under which he had also resided he would have had a good case as Illinois is not bound by such domestic restrictions as Washington.
But what the court said on the grounds that he could never be a citizen was patiently not written, and provably not true, and there were already such citizens. it was simply not within the power of the Federal laws to grant such citizenship. That requires a State, and Illinois could have done it.
Thus I agree with the outcome of the case but not the constitutional edict.
The Republican party is Dead.Its time to get a Third Party.The Republicans got their chance at changing some of these policies and what did they do?They rolled over and died.They don’t deserve a second or third chance.
This Republican debate issue that’s coming up.16 candidates is a prime example of a dead party.There is No way that the Republicans can win with that division.
If the judicial branch wishes to make law, that is, to pursue the functions of a legislative branch, then it is necessary that it be subject to the same checks on its power, such as limited terms of office, and elections.
If only the perfumed princes in the pentagon had the same moral courage as did Justice Curtis.
