To: napscoordinator
It’s a rotten way to treat the employees when a phone call ahead of time would negate the problem. Is that too much to ask of an employer?
To: BipolarBob
Its a rotten way to treat the employees when a phone call ahead of time would negate the problem. Is that too much to ask of an employer?
It is not the place of government, at any level, to legislate this type of crap.
13 posted on
07/17/2015 2:49:17 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: BipolarBob
Its a rotten way to treat the employees when a phone call ahead of time would negate the problem. Is that too much to ask of an employer? Uh, dude, being a rotten employer is not a crime....but having government meddling in this arena is damned sure un-Constitutional. Are you saying that government should be so involved as to make sure no employer ever inconveniences an employee? How big of a gummint do you want?
32 posted on
07/17/2015 3:08:24 PM PDT by
C. Edmund Wright
(WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
To: BipolarBob
Small businesses often work at paper thin margins. Things can happen at the last minute that changes plans and makes a given employee's job unnecessary. Paying that employee to do nothing could cripple the business.
A law like this could put some businesses out of business. A lot of on-demand employees would loose their second job
And like the others have already said their is no constitutional basis for a law like this.
46 posted on
07/17/2015 3:51:16 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson