Posted on 07/10/2015 11:00:11 AM PDT by jazusamo
Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, have been ordered to give depositions in a civil case investigating the pair’s growing email scandal.
Mrs. Clinton will giver her deposition on the morning of July 28 in Washington, and Mr. Clinton will give his the following morning, according to copies of the notices of deposition reviewed by The Washington Times.
The case, filed by Freedom Watch founder and former federal prosecutor Larry Klayman, alleges the couple committed criminal violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
According to a statement from Freedom Watch, the suit alleges Mrs. Clinton, the front-runner for the 2016 Democratic nomination, covered up these crimes by destroying her personal emails sent during her time as Secretary of State.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
1) Who administered the email server? (it sure as hell wasn't Hillary or Bill
2) Where are the backup tapes?
3) Why haven't those tapes been provided?
Anything else is show and politics.
I love watching the “nothing will happen” shills flock to these Clinton threads. The Clinton Foundation spends a lot of money on FR postings.
What’s the point, they’ll forget and when that doesn’t fit, they’ll lie like hell. Here’s an idea, how about their partners in crime get deposed first. Besides, no one in DC will ever prosecute these two criminals because they are all criminals and they are scared to DEATH of the Clintons.
And not that "is is" finis gotten from Bubba's rope-a-dope with Ken Starr's clowns.
And, please, keep that up-state boop Trey out of it.
Was Chelsea Hubbell subpoena’d?
How can they when those emails don’t exist?
“I love watching the “nothing will happen” shills flock to these Clinton threads. The Clinton Foundation spends a lot of money on FR postings.”
I’m pretty skeptical that anything will happen. Where do I sign up for my check?
Not expecting much, but it would be nice if Hilary’s pantsuit collection expanded to include a bunch more in orange.
Absolutely...Orange pantsuits would look great on her, with matching scarf. :)
She was born by artificial dissemination..................
lol
Larry Klayman couldn't win a one horse race....
“lie fests”
Even though I emphatically agree that, Billary will lie through their teeth, and I suspect just about everyone here would agree with that assessment.
OK, some recent history since Bill’s veracity is—clearing throat—a dicey.
Due to Monica Lewinsky submitting her soiled blue dress, and since DNA forensic evidence doesn’t lie, the entire nation knows he’s a liar ..... but those darned Republicrat senators:
Clinton was impeached on two counts, grand jury perjury (228–206) and obstruction of justice (221–212), with the votes split along party lines.
The Senate Republicans, however, were unable to gather enough support to achieve the two-thirds majority required for his conviction.
On Feb. 12, 1999, the Senate acquitted President Clinton on both counts. The perjury charge failed by a vote of 55–45, with 10 Republicans voting against impeachment along with all 45 Democrats. The obstruction of justice vote was 50–50, with 5 Republicans breaking ranks to vote against impeachment.
The five Republican senators who voted against conviction on both charges were John Chafee of Rhode Island, Susan Collins of Maine, Jim Jeffords of Vermont, Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. The additional five Republican senators who voted “not guilty” only on the perjury charge were Slade Gorton of Washington, Richard Shelby of Alabama, Ted Stevens of Alaska, Fred Thompson of Tennessee, and John Warner of Virginia.
Way to go boys! Your pusillanimity led to the present day where Democrats `flip the bird’ at the courts while demanding that all others comply with their courts’ shock-the-conscience orders.
Imagine how happy the Clintons must be to know they’ll have to spend vast amounts of time together getting their lies straight.
They’ll just lie, knowing they’ll get away with it.
Bump.
The judge entered a scheduling order with a trial date shortly after the case was filed. That doesn’t mean the case will actually go to trial on that date or at all.
The Clintons will or already have filed various motions to dismiss. If denied, these will be followed by motions for summary judgment. If denied, these will be followed by motions for continuance and interlocutory appeals.
Meanwhile, Klayman has served the Clintons’ attorneys with notices of deposition, basically saying “I intend to take your clients’ depositions on these dates and at these locations.” These will be followed by motions to quash on multiple grounds (including objections to the location, date and time, and objections to depositions being taken before the court rules on any and all pending motions to dismiss and/or summary judgment and/or before written discovery is completed).
On minor cases without deep pocketed defendants, I have seen these discovery fights drag on for months and years. In this case, you have defendants with unlimited money who will spend whatever it takes to derail this train.
I hope that Klayman is able to force their depositions, but I am not holding my breath that he will be able to do so anytime soon.
Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.