Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thomas Piketty: "Germany Has Never Repaid Its Debts; It Has No Standing To Lecture Other Nations"
Zero Hedge ^ | 07/06/2015 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 07/06/2015 10:04:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

One year after Thomas Piketty sold a record number of economic textbook paperweights which virtually nobody read past page 26, once again showing the power of constant media hype, the French economist and wealth redistributor is out and about, this time pouring more gasoline on the fire started by the IMF last week when it released the Greek debt sustainability analysis showing Greece needs a 30% haircut, only to be met with stern resistance by, who else, Germany who know very well that should Greece get a debt haircut it will unleash the European dominoes which not even all the bluster and rhetoric of the ECB can halt.

And while Piketty's book may have sold out in socialist France, it seems Germany did not leave a pleasant taste in the celebrity economist's mouth, and in an interview with Germany's Zeit magazine, translated into English, the Frenchman just made sure he will never sell another book east of the Rhine. Here is the reason why:

When I hear the Germans say that they maintain a very moral stance about debt and strongly believe that debts must be repaid, then I think: what a huge joke! Germany is the country that has never repaid its debts. It has no standing to lecture other nations.

 

... Germany is really the single best example of a country that, throughout its history, has never repaid its external debt. Neither after the First nor the Second World War. However, it has frequently made other nations pay up, such as after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, when it demanded massive reparations from France and indeed received them. The French state suffered for decades under this debt. The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.

What he said is perfectly factual and accurate, but in the new normal, truth is not a welcome commodity, especially when it pulls the scab on the single biggest problem with the modern economy, namely the gargantuan debt overhang (see Greece) which nobody can possibly default on without triggering massive contagion around the globe and thus leaving (hyper)inflation as the only possible way out.

A good question is whether this philosophical contrast exposed by Piketty is also indicative of the fundamental schism that is appearing not only within the Troika, where the IMF effectively won Tsipras' referendum for him, but also within the Eurogroup, where Germany may soon find itself increasingly isolated as not only peripheral countries but soon France start clamoring for debt haircuts not only abroad but also back at home...

Full interview:

Thomas Piketty: “Germany has never repaid.”

In a forceful interview with German newspaper Die Zeit, the star economist Thomas Piketty calls for a major conference on debt. Germany, in particular, should not withhold help from Greece. This interview has been translated from the original German.

Since his successful book, “Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” the Frenchman Thomas Piketty has been considered one of the most influential economists in the world. His argument for the redistribution of income and wealth launched a worldwide discussion. In a interview with Georg Blume of DIE ZEIT, he gives his clear opinions on the European debt debate.

DIE ZEIT: Should we Germans be happy that even the French government is aligned with the German dogma of austerity?

Thomas Piketty: Absolutely not. This is neither a reason for France, nor Germany, and especially not for Europe, to be happy. I am much more afraid that the conservatives, especially in Germany, are about to destroy Europe and the European idea, all because of their shocking ignorance of history.

ZEIT: But we Germans have already reckoned with our own history.

Piketty: But not when it comes to repaying debts! Germany’s past, in this respect, should be of great significance to today’s Germans. Look at the history of national debt: Great Britain, Germany, and France were all once in the situation of today’s Greece, and in fact had been far more indebted. The first lesson that we can take from the history of government debt is that we are not facing a brand new problem. There have been many ways to repay debts, and not just one, which is what Berlin and Paris would have the Greeks believe.

ZEIT: But shouldn’t they repay their debts?

Piketty: My book recounts the history of income and wealth, including that of nations. What struck me while I was writing is that Germany is really the single best example of a country that, throughout its history, has never repaid its external debt. Neither after the First nor the Second World War. However, it has frequently made other nations pay up, such as after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, when it demanded massive reparations from France and indeed received them. The French state suffered for decades under this debt. The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.

ZEIT: But surely we can’t draw the conclusion that we can do no better today?

Piketty: When I hear the Germans say that they maintain a very moral stance about debt and strongly believe that debts must be repaid, then I think: what a huge joke! Germany is the country that has never repaid its debts. It has no standing to lecture other nations.

ZEIT: Are you trying to depict states that don’t pay back their debts as winners?

Piketty: Germany is just such a state. But wait: history shows us two ways for an indebted state to leave delinquency. One was demonstrated by the British Empire in the 19th century after its expensive wars with Napoleon. It is the slow method that is now being recommended to Greece. The Empire repaid its debts through strict budgetary discipline. This worked, but it took an extremely long time. For over 100 years, the British gave up two to three percent of their economy to repay its debts, which was more than they spent on schools and education. That didn’t have to happen, and it shouldn’t happen today. The second method is much faster. Germany proved it in the 20th century. Essentially, it consists of three components: inflation, a special tax on private wealth, and debt relief.

ZEIT: So you’re telling us that the German Wirtschaftswunder [“economic miracle”] was based on the same kind of debt relief that we deny Greece today?

Piketty: Exactly. After the war ended in 1945, Germany’s debt amounted to over 200% of its GDP. Ten years later, little of that remained: public debt was less than 20% of GDP. Around the same time, France managed a similarly artful turnaround. We never would have managed this unbelievably fast reduction in debt through the fiscal discipline that we today recommend to Greece. Instead, both of our states employed the second method with the three components that I mentioned, including debt relief. Think about the London Debt Agreement of 1953, where 60% of German foreign debt was cancelled and its internal debts were restructured.

ZEIT: That happened because people recognized that the high reparations demanded of Germany after World War I were one of the causes of the Second World War. People wanted to forgive Germany’s sins this time!

Piketty: Nonsense! This had nothing to do with moral clarity; it was a rational political and economic decision. They correctly recognized that, after large crises that created huge debt loads, at some point people need to look toward the future. We cannot demand that new generations must pay for decades for the mistakes of their parents. The Greeks have, without a doubt, made big mistakes. Until 2009, the government in Athens forged its books. But despite this, the younger generation of Greeks carries no more responsibility for the mistakes of its elders than the younger generation of Germans did in the 1950s and 1960s. We need to look ahead. Europe was founded on debt forgiveness and investment in the future. Not on the idea of endless penance. We need to remember this.

ZEIT: The end of the Second World War was a breakdown of civilization. Europe was a killing field. Today is different.

Piketty: To deny the historical parallels to the postwar period would be wrong. Let’s think about the financial crisis of 2008/2009. This wasn’t just any crisis. It was the biggest financial crisis since 1929. So the comparison is quite valid. This is equally true for the Greek economy: between 2009 and 2015, its GDP has fallen by 25%. This is comparable to the recessions in Germany and France between 1929 and 1935.

ZEIT: Many Germans believe that the Greeks still have not recognized their mistakes and want to continue their free-spending ways.

Piketty: If we had told you Germans in the 1950s that you have not properly recognized your failures, you would still be repaying your debts. Luckily, we were more intelligent than that.

ZEIT: The German Minister of Finance, on the other hand, seems to believe that a Greek exit from the Eurozone could foster greater unity within Europe.

Piketty: If we start kicking states out, then the crisis of confidence in which the Eurozone finds itself today will only worsen. Financial markets will immediately turn on the next country. This would be the beginning of a long, drawn-out period of agony, in whose grasp we risk sacrificing Europe’s social model, its democracy, indeed its civilization on the altar of a conservative, irrational austerity policy.

ZEIT: Do you believe that we Germans aren’t generous enough?

Piketty: What are you talking about? Generous? Currently, Germany is profiting from Greece as it extends loans at comparatively high interest rates.

ZEIT: What solution would you suggest for this crisis?

Piketty: We need a conference on all of Europe’s debts, just like after World War II. A restructuring of all debt, not just in Greece but in several European countries, is inevitable. Just now, we’ve lost six months in the completely intransparent negotiations with Athens. The Eurogroup’s notion that Greece will reach a budgetary surplus of 4% of GDP and will pay back its debts within 30 to 40 years is still on the table. Allegedly, they will reach one percent surplus in 2015, then two percent in 2016, and three and a half percent in 2017. Completely ridiculous! This will never happen. Yet we keep postponing the necessary debate until the cows come home.

ZEIT: And what would happen after the major debt cuts?

Piketty: A new European institution would be required to determine the maximum allowable budget deficit in order to prevent the regrowth of debt. For example, this could be a commmittee in the European Parliament consisting of legislators from national parliaments. Budgetary decisions should not be off-limits to legislatures. To undermine European democracy, which is what Germany is doing today by insisting that states remain in penury under mechanisms that Berlin itself is muscling through, is a grievous mistake.

ZEIT: Your president, François Hollande, recently failed to criticize the fiscal pact.

Piketty: This does not improve anything. If, in past years, decisions in Europe had been reached in more democratic ways, the current austerity policy in Europe would be less strict.

ZEIT: But no political party in France is participating. National sovereignty is considered holy.

Piketty: Indeed, in Germany many more people are entertaining thoughts of reestablishing European democracy, in contrast to France with its countless believers in sovereignty. What’s more, our president still portrays himself as a prisoner of the failed 2005 referendum on a European Constitution, which failed in France. François Hollande does not understand that a lot has changed because of the financial crisis. We have to overcome our own national egoism.

ZEIT: What sort of national egoism do you see in Germany?

Piketty: I think that Germany was greatly shaped by its reunification. It was long feared that it would lead to economic stagnation. But then reunification turned out to be a great success thanks to a functioning social safety net and an intact industrial sector. Meanwhile, Germany has become so proud of its success that it dispenses lectures to all other countries. This is a little infantile. Of course, I understand how important the successful reunification was to the personal history of Chancellor Angela Merkel. But now Germany has to rethink things. Otherwise, its position on the debt crisis will be a grave danger to Europe.

ZEIT: What advice do you have for the Chancellor?

Piketty: Those who want to chase Greece out of the Eurozone today will end up on the trash heap of history. If the Chancellor wants to secure her place in the history books, just like [Helmut] Kohl did during reunification, then she must forge a solution to the Greek question, including a debt conference where we can start with a clean slate. But with renewed, much stronger fiscal discipline.

This interview was translated by Gavin Schalliol.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debt; germany; greece; piketty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: HiTech RedNeck

They had already changed this practice since December and the citizens have been howling ever since. They cling to their hoarding, insistence on maintaining the largess for which they voted and are adamantly and vehemently against actually being personally responsible for that largess (debt) via confiscation of their money.

I’m only hoping Obama doesn’t increase the Greece allocation for immigration to a million or something.


21 posted on 07/06/2015 10:26:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Germany did repay its WWI debts by 2010. I gather there were adjustments along the way and I'd suppose that there were long periods (1939-1945?) when they weren't paying anything back.

Britain is paying off its WWI debt this year. That's been questioned though. How do you separate out one part of a massive national debt and attribute it to one specific loan period?

22 posted on 07/06/2015 10:26:32 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Merkel: I got your debt payment right here.

23 posted on 07/06/2015 10:27:34 AM PDT by McGruff (Eat a snickers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They ended up paying the Soviet Union with half their women.


24 posted on 07/06/2015 10:32:06 AM PDT by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“RE: Germany Makes Final WW1 Debt Payment
Are they liable to pay anything for WW II?”

German reparations for World War II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_reparations_for_World_War_II

After World War II, both West Germany and East Germany were obliged to pay war reparations to the Allied governments, according to the Potsdam Conference. Other Axis nations were obliged to pay war reparations according to the Paris Peace Treaties of 1947.

London Agreement on German External Debts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Agreement_on_German_External_Debts

The total under negotiation was 16 billion marks of debt resulting from the Treaty of Versailles after World War I which had not been paid in the 1930s, but which Germany decided to repay to restore its reputation. This money was owed to government and private banks in the U.S., France and Britain. Another 16 billion marks represented postwar loans by the U.S. Under the London Debts Agreement of 1953, the repayable amount was reduced by 50% to about 15 billion marks and stretched out over 30 years, and compared to the fast-growing German economy were of minor impact.

Some of the agreement included debts to be paid after the reunification of Germany. Over decades it seemed unlikely to transpire, but in 1990 another 239.4 million Deutsche Mark of unpaid coupons were revived. On 3 October 2010 the last payment was made of 69.9 million euro.[4] This is considered to be the last payment by Germany on all known debts resulting from both world wars.


25 posted on 07/06/2015 10:34:21 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

In 2014, countries are still paying off debt from World War One
http://qz.com/290183/in-2014-countries-are-still-paying-off-debt-from-world-war-one/

Germany

On Oct. 3, 2010, Germany finally paid off all its debt from World War One. The total? About 269 billion marks, or around 96,000 tons of gold.

The reparations were part of many humiliating clauses imposed by the Treaty of Versailles following Germany’s defeat in 1918, mainly by France, which suffered so much during the war and was also fearful that without the weight of such repayments, Germany would rise again quickly as a military power and attack it.

The UK sent a certain economist, John Maynard Keynes, as the principal representative of the British Treasury to the Paris Peace Conference. He resigned in June 1919 in protest at the size of reparations. “Germany will not be able to formulate correct policy if it cannot finance itself,” Keynes said. All very prescient, as Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party seized on popular hatred of the Versailles treaty to take power. Following the Great Depression in 1929, Germany’s debt was cut to 112 billion marks, payable over a period of 59 years. Not that it mattered—Hitler suspended reparation repayments in 1933.

In 1953, following the end of the Second World War, West Germany agreed at a conference in London to pay off its debts from before World War II, and in return was allowed to wait until reunification before paying €125 million in outstanding interest owed from 1945-1952. In 1990, the Berlin wall fell and Germany started paying off that interest—the very last of which was paid in October 2010 on the 20th anniversary of reunification.

One of the lessons of World War Two was the consequences of lumbering a losing nation with huge debts. “After WWII, they decided to hang the leaders but not to punish the nation,” Mark Harrison, an economics professor at University of Warwick, told the BBC. “But in WWI, it was the other way around.”


26 posted on 07/06/2015 10:38:39 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Does Germany Really Owe Greece A €trillion In War Reparations? Probably Not, No
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/09/12/does-germany-really-owe-greece-a-etrillion-in-war-reparations-probably-not-no/

(excerpt)
This is a lovely story that has been doing the rounds for a while now. The idea that Germany owes Greece some vast amount in reparations for WWII. An amount sufficiently large that Greece would have entirely a get out of jail free card from its debt. It’s all quite fascinating and while there’s a certain truth to it it’s most unlikely that the larger claims are true.

But as you can see, even that is problematic. There’s rather a Catch-22 situation there. If they can show that the money was stolen then it doesn’t have to be paid back. If it’s a normal credit then, well, inflation of a zero interest loan has been such that Germany could pay it all back tomorrow without breaking a sweat and without improving the Greek situation more than only the tiniest amount. That’s a tough needle to thread in a legal sense: proving that it was a simple commercial transaction but then arguing that it was under duress which is why no interest was charged.

It should be noted that such forced loans were not unusual under the Nazis. The best description of their financial policies that I’ve seen is “Hitler’s Beneficiaries” by Goetz Aly. As I recall it he uses the Greek events as an example of how the system worked more generally across many countries. There’s a good review of the book here

I think we might be able to make a moral case that Germany owes some amount to Greece for the depredations of those years. Not all that strong a one though, given that the Germans alive today just happen to be the people inhabiting that land, not the people who did the damage. I am tempted too by the idea that that forced loan might be due. Do note that these are entirely personal opinions though. However, I cannot see that there is any legal case to be brought. The war reparations seem to have been covered by various treaties over the decades. The forced loan, well, as above, if it was stolen then it isn’t repayable in law and if it was a commercial loan then given the no interest clause then it’s near irrelevant.


27 posted on 07/06/2015 10:41:57 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Europe needed the Marshall Plan because much of Europe's industrial and agricultural infrastructure suffered tremendously from the ravages of World War II. Even Great Britain was still on rationing until the early 1950's due to the need to rebuild so much of the country from the effects of the German World War II bombing raids, especially around the city of London.

Indeed, what became the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) didn't get back to economic growth until the middle 1950's. Indeed, the decision to save Volkswagen proved to be a boon to the German economy as the rebuilt factory in Wolfsburg became a visible symbol of the rebirth of German industrial might.

28 posted on 07/06/2015 10:50:54 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
What happens when a bank makes a bad loan is that they take a loss on the principal and restructure the remaining principle under terms that are feasible. This is what the Germans REFUSED to do

Feasible terms? The private and bank holders took something like a 50% haircut. When the ECB, IMF and Euro governments took over the remainder, they stretched out the due dates to something like 30 years at an interest rate around 2%.

If the Greeks can't handle that, it might be related to their government spending close to 60% of GDP.

29 posted on 07/06/2015 11:02:29 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“However, it has frequently made other nations pay up, such as after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, when it demanded massive reparations from France and indeed received them. The French state suffered for decades under this debt.”

Well, the French were too meek to call their bluff and tell them where to stick their reparations. Probably still haven’t learned that lesson, to this day.


30 posted on 07/06/2015 11:04:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Correct, the ramblings of a socialist idiot. There is nothing brave about not paying ones debts. What Greece is doing is infantile.


31 posted on 07/06/2015 11:29:03 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: babble-on
He’s right about that.

Also, he's not real big on debt repayment in general. His attitude seems to be "If you have it, you don't need most of it."

32 posted on 07/06/2015 11:44:43 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Piketty is lying his ass off.

1. The Treaty of Versailles was not only vindictive, it demanded reparations from Germany and forbade Germany from running an export surplus with which to make the payments. The only possible way Germany could have complied with the terms of the treaty would have been to discover gold within its territory.

John Maynard Keynes wrote about this in his little book The Economic Consequences of the Peace. He didn’t get all the details right, but he was absolutely correct as to the effects of the treaty. France and England bear part of the responsibility for WWII because of that treaty.

2. We, the U.S., did not ratify that treaty and, after Harding was elected, made a separate peace with Germany and each of the other belligerents. Harding started, and the Coolidge concluded negotiations for the Dawes Plan to deal with the debt problem.

3. We, the U.S., would have none of the vindictiveness of Versailles following WWII. Instead, through the Marshall Plan, we sought to build up the democracies of Europe, including those of former enemies as well as those of former allies. We did not take any territory after WWI or WWII, nor make reparations demands after either. We’re a decent country that views wars as evil and the result of evil governments, not of the people of the nations. We view them mostly as victims themselves.

4. Greece does not have a debt problem because of war. It has a debt problem because of welfare socialism. Even if all its debts were wiped out, they’d still have a budget deficit to deal with and nobody in their right mind will “lend” any more money to them. Lending money to Greeks is like lending money to crack addicts. You’re not going to be repaid. Not ever. The modern country of Greece has never repaid its foreign debt and has repeatedly wiped out its domestic debt through inflation.

5. Greece’s foreign debt has already been reduced. Twice.

Piketty can’t be so stupid to not know these things. It must be that he is such an anti-capitalist and anti-American, radical left-wing progressive socialist that there is no connection between reality and what he says.

Hey, maybe he could be an advisor to Pope Francis.


33 posted on 07/06/2015 11:55:55 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

We didn’t take any land after WWI or WWII. But we did acquire the Virgin Islands by purchase from Denmark during WWI, and we eventually acquired the Northern Marianas Islands (formerly a Japanese mandate from the League of Nations, and before that a German possession, purchased from the original colonizers, the Spanish), but that was as a result of a vote by the inhabitants in 1975. The Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands comprises 184 square miles of land (less than Guam). We didn’t take any land that belonged to our enemies—Germany, Japan, or Italy.


34 posted on 07/06/2015 12:48:43 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Book Mark


35 posted on 07/06/2015 5:00:14 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Nope.
36 posted on 07/06/2015 6:49:07 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson