Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free_SJersey

The powers behind the news were uniformly run by companies that were pro-Vietnam War. The protests were covered and they were anything but very small, other than in their infancy.

The protests took a while to get started precisely because the press was pro-Vietnam War. The American people were presented zero coverage that was anti-war for a long time before negative coverage started slipping through.

Here is Newsweek’s coverage: http://clickamericana.com/eras/1960s/the-vietnam-war-as-seen-on-newsweek-magazine-covers-1965-1973

During a bombing halt in September 1967, Harrison E. Salisbury of the New York Times became the first correspondent from a major U.S. newspaper to go to North Vietnam.

His reporting of the bombing damage to civilian targets forced the Pentagon to admit that accidents and “collateral damage” had occurred during the bombing campaign.

For his effort, Salisbury received heavy condemnation and criticism from his peers, the administration, and the Pentagon.


37 posted on 07/05/2015 12:32:04 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: All
 photo Orwells20TV-467x349.jpg
Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
On FR Coming By "Clicking Here"!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


38 posted on 07/05/2015 12:37:59 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson